Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Kuhn’s Deconstruction of the Scientific Method as a Roadmap to Social Epistemology

O. Tunde
{"title":"Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Kuhn’s Deconstruction of the Scientific Method as a Roadmap to Social Epistemology","authors":"O. Tunde","doi":"10.23880/PHIJ-16000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that truth, knowledge and rational certainty are objective is fundamental to traditional epistemology. Objectivism is understood as universal standards that apply to all phenomenon irrespective of time and space and the scientific method of rational inquiry is enthroned by positivists as the guarantor of objectivity. Kuhn disagrees with this idea in his detailed analysis of how scientific paradigms are developed. The significantly shifted focus to the social dimensions of knowledge, which current discussions within social and collective epistemology is exploring to enrich our process of knowledge practice. Between traditional foundational epistemology and social epistemology, our understanding of what knowledge is has witnessed an evolution, which this paper presents as a welcome attitude to epistemic inquiry.","PeriodicalId":340902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy International Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/PHIJ-16000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea that truth, knowledge and rational certainty are objective is fundamental to traditional epistemology. Objectivism is understood as universal standards that apply to all phenomenon irrespective of time and space and the scientific method of rational inquiry is enthroned by positivists as the guarantor of objectivity. Kuhn disagrees with this idea in his detailed analysis of how scientific paradigms are developed. The significantly shifted focus to the social dimensions of knowledge, which current discussions within social and collective epistemology is exploring to enrich our process of knowledge practice. Between traditional foundational epistemology and social epistemology, our understanding of what knowledge is has witnessed an evolution, which this paper presents as a welcome attitude to epistemic inquiry.
超越客观主义和相对主义:库恩对科学方法的解构作为通往社会认识论的路线图
真理、知识和理性确定性是客观的,这是传统认识论的基础。客观主义被理解为适用于所有现象的普遍标准,而不受时间和空间的限制,而理性探究的科学方法则被实证主义者奉为客观性的保证人。库恩在他对科学范式如何发展的详细分析中不同意这种观点。目前社会和集体认识论的讨论正在探索知识的社会维度,以丰富我们的知识实践过程。在传统的基础认识论和社会认识论之间,我们对知识的理解经历了一场演变,本文提出了一种欢迎认识论探究的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信