Education Research: Bridging the Undergraduate Neurosciences With Clinical Neurology

M. Minen, Sangida Akter, Mariana Espinosa-Polanco, R. Ramos
{"title":"Education Research: Bridging the Undergraduate Neurosciences With Clinical Neurology","authors":"M. Minen, Sangida Akter, Mariana Espinosa-Polanco, R. Ramos","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a significant shortage of neurologists in the United States, and this shortage is projected to worsen considerably. With the growth of undergraduate neuroscience majors, there may be opportunities to engage and motivate undergraduate students interested in the neurosciences toward clinical neurology. We surveyed undergraduate neuroscience faculty to better understand their curricular goals, existing interaction with neurologists, and their desire for additional connections with clinical neurologists and clinical neurology researchers. We invited 523 undergraduate neuroscience faculty (members of Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience) to complete an online survey assessing their research areas, courses taught, existing professional networks, and interest in developing connections in clinical neurology/neurology research. We had 140 of the 523 neuroscience faculty (26.8%) complete the survey. Of the 140 respondents, most respondents (93.6%, 131/140) stated their courses included a discussion about neurologic conditions, yet only 4% (6/139) stated addressing the shortage of neurologists in the country. Few reported they were able to partake in professional development opportunities for shadowing neurologists, neurosurgeons, or similar specialists prior to teaching neuroscience courses (19%, 26/140). Understanding neuroscience faculty's perspectives on how to bridge undergraduate neuroscience programs and the field of neurology is critical. This way, we can identify potential gaps and make recommendations for how to improve the neurology pipeline.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"53 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology: Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is a significant shortage of neurologists in the United States, and this shortage is projected to worsen considerably. With the growth of undergraduate neuroscience majors, there may be opportunities to engage and motivate undergraduate students interested in the neurosciences toward clinical neurology. We surveyed undergraduate neuroscience faculty to better understand their curricular goals, existing interaction with neurologists, and their desire for additional connections with clinical neurologists and clinical neurology researchers. We invited 523 undergraduate neuroscience faculty (members of Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience) to complete an online survey assessing their research areas, courses taught, existing professional networks, and interest in developing connections in clinical neurology/neurology research. We had 140 of the 523 neuroscience faculty (26.8%) complete the survey. Of the 140 respondents, most respondents (93.6%, 131/140) stated their courses included a discussion about neurologic conditions, yet only 4% (6/139) stated addressing the shortage of neurologists in the country. Few reported they were able to partake in professional development opportunities for shadowing neurologists, neurosurgeons, or similar specialists prior to teaching neuroscience courses (19%, 26/140). Understanding neuroscience faculty's perspectives on how to bridge undergraduate neuroscience programs and the field of neurology is critical. This way, we can identify potential gaps and make recommendations for how to improve the neurology pipeline.
教育研究:衔接本科神经科学与临床神经学
美国的神经科医生严重短缺,而且这种短缺预计会严重恶化。随着神经科学本科专业的增长,可能有机会吸引和激励对神经科学感兴趣的本科生走向临床神经病学。我们调查了本科神经科学教师,以更好地了解他们的课程目标,与神经学家的现有互动,以及他们与临床神经学家和临床神经学研究人员的额外联系的愿望。我们邀请了523名神经科学本科教师(神经科学本科学院的成员)完成一项在线调查,评估他们的研究领域、教授的课程、现有的专业网络以及在临床神经病学/神经病学研究中发展联系的兴趣。我们让523名神经科学教师中的140名(26.8%)完成了调查。在140名受访者中,大多数受访者(93.6%,131/140)表示他们的课程包括关于神经系统疾病的讨论,但只有4%(6/139)表示解决了该国神经科医生的短缺问题。很少有人报告说,在教授神经科学课程之前,他们能够参加神经学家、神经外科医生或类似专家的专业发展机会(19%,26/140)。了解神经科学教师对如何将本科神经科学课程与神经学领域联系起来的观点至关重要。通过这种方式,我们可以确定潜在的差距,并就如何改善神经学管道提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信