Programming, Research and... Coffee?: An Analysis of Workplace Activities by Computing Interns

H. Aldewereld, Esther van der Stappen
{"title":"Programming, Research and... Coffee?: An Analysis of Workplace Activities by Computing Interns","authors":"H. Aldewereld, Esther van der Stappen","doi":"10.1145/3375258.3375264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To overcome the skills gap between industry demands and learning outcomes achieved by graduates in higher computing education, many Bachelor programs integrate some form of internship in their curriculum; students are assumed to encounter authentic tasks and recent technologies in the workplace. In practice, however, educators often do not know specifically which tasks their students perform and which technologies they use, mainly due to the distance between coach and student during the work placement and the lack of cohort-based overviews of activities performed in internships. In this study, we gathered and analyzed workplace activity data of 54 students over the course of their third-year semester-long internships in the computing industry. We performed descriptive analyses to gain insight into i) which categories of activities students performed most (programming, research and documentation) and ii) which of the activity categories they find most difficult (research, documentation (both academic and IT) and implementation/configuration). Subsequent text analysis gives us insight into students' perceptions of the categories used to label activities (testing, research, meetings, and academic documentation are congruous) and which technologies were used most by these students. Based on the results, we conclude it is feasible to use user-generated data to get insights into workplace activities of computing interns. The quality of this user-generated data does hamper us in drawing certain conclusions. Further research is needed with improved data quality and volume in order to obtain more generalizable results.","PeriodicalId":120434,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To overcome the skills gap between industry demands and learning outcomes achieved by graduates in higher computing education, many Bachelor programs integrate some form of internship in their curriculum; students are assumed to encounter authentic tasks and recent technologies in the workplace. In practice, however, educators often do not know specifically which tasks their students perform and which technologies they use, mainly due to the distance between coach and student during the work placement and the lack of cohort-based overviews of activities performed in internships. In this study, we gathered and analyzed workplace activity data of 54 students over the course of their third-year semester-long internships in the computing industry. We performed descriptive analyses to gain insight into i) which categories of activities students performed most (programming, research and documentation) and ii) which of the activity categories they find most difficult (research, documentation (both academic and IT) and implementation/configuration). Subsequent text analysis gives us insight into students' perceptions of the categories used to label activities (testing, research, meetings, and academic documentation are congruous) and which technologies were used most by these students. Based on the results, we conclude it is feasible to use user-generated data to get insights into workplace activities of computing interns. The quality of this user-generated data does hamper us in drawing certain conclusions. Further research is needed with improved data quality and volume in order to obtain more generalizable results.
编程、研究和…咖啡吗?计算机实习生的工作场所活动分析
为了克服行业需求与高等计算机教育毕业生的学习成果之间的技能差距,许多本科课程在课程中整合了某种形式的实习;学生们应该在工作场所遇到真实的任务和最新的技术。然而,在实践中,教育工作者往往不知道他们的学生具体执行哪些任务和使用哪些技术,这主要是由于在工作实习期间教练和学生之间的距离,以及缺乏基于队列的实习活动概述。在这项研究中,我们收集并分析了54名学生在计算机行业实习的第三学期的工作场所活动数据。我们进行了描述性分析,以深入了解i)学生执行最多的活动类别(编程,研究和文档)和ii)他们发现最困难的活动类别(研究,文档(学术和IT)和实现/配置)。随后的文本分析使我们深入了解学生对用于标记活动的类别(测试、研究、会议和学术文档是一致的)的看法,以及这些学生最常用的技术。基于研究结果,我们认为使用用户生成的数据来了解计算机实习生的工作场所活动是可行的。这些用户生成数据的质量确实妨碍了我们得出某些结论。为了获得更普遍的结果,需要进一步研究提高数据质量和数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信