The Comparision of Self-Leadership Levels of Sports Sciences Academics with Their Political Skills

Cemal Özman, S. B. Çavuşoğlu
{"title":"The Comparision of Self-Leadership Levels of Sports Sciences Academics with Their Political Skills","authors":"Cemal Özman, S. B. Çavuşoğlu","doi":"10.47994/usbad.1084297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the self-leadership levels of academics in the field of Sports Sciences with their political skills level. The research samples include the academics working in the field of Sports Sciences in public and private universities in Turkey. There are 251 academics participating in this study. The data has been collected and analyzed using the survey technique. Regarding the research topic, the self-leadership scale has been used as a data collection tool to measure validity and reliability tests of Tabak, Sığrı and Türköz (2013) adapted to Turkish. In orderto determine the political skills of academics in the field of Sport Sciences, Ferris et al. (2005) tried to develop it and Özdemir and Gören (2015) used Political Skills Inventory which was adapted to Turkish in educational organizations that also made the validity and reliability studies of the Turkish form Exploratory factor analysis was used on self- leadership and political skill scales, the self-leadership scale is divided into 8 sub-dimensions and the political skill scale into 4 sub- dimensions In correlation analysis, when there are no parametric cases, non-parametric Spearmann rank correlation coefficient was used. It was concluded that there was a 43% moderate relationship between the political skills and self-leadership scales. This research was presented as a paper at the 18th International Sports Sciences Congress.","PeriodicalId":164627,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47994/usbad.1084297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the self-leadership levels of academics in the field of Sports Sciences with their political skills level. The research samples include the academics working in the field of Sports Sciences in public and private universities in Turkey. There are 251 academics participating in this study. The data has been collected and analyzed using the survey technique. Regarding the research topic, the self-leadership scale has been used as a data collection tool to measure validity and reliability tests of Tabak, Sığrı and Türköz (2013) adapted to Turkish. In orderto determine the political skills of academics in the field of Sport Sciences, Ferris et al. (2005) tried to develop it and Özdemir and Gören (2015) used Political Skills Inventory which was adapted to Turkish in educational organizations that also made the validity and reliability studies of the Turkish form Exploratory factor analysis was used on self- leadership and political skill scales, the self-leadership scale is divided into 8 sub-dimensions and the political skill scale into 4 sub- dimensions In correlation analysis, when there are no parametric cases, non-parametric Spearmann rank correlation coefficient was used. It was concluded that there was a 43% moderate relationship between the political skills and self-leadership scales. This research was presented as a paper at the 18th International Sports Sciences Congress.
体育科学工作者自我领导水平与政治技能的比较研究
本研究旨在比较体育科学领域学者的自我领导水平与政治技能水平。研究样本包括土耳其公立和私立大学体育科学领域的学者。共有251名学者参与了本次研究。使用调查技术收集和分析了数据。本研究课题采用自我领导量表作为数据收集工具,测量Tabak、Sığrı和Türköz(2013)对土耳其语的效度和信度检验。为了确定体育科学领域学者的政治技能,Ferris等人(2005)试图开发它,Özdemir和Gören(2015)使用政治技能量表,该量表适用于教育组织中的土耳其语,并对土耳其语形式进行了效度和信度研究,探索性因素分析用于自我领导和政治技能量表。自我领导量表分为8个子维度,政治技能量表分为4个子维度。在相关分析中,当没有参数案例时,采用非参数Spearmann秩相关系数。结果表明,政治技巧与自我领导量表之间存在43%的适度关系。这项研究在第18届国际体育科学大会上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信