Rural Experience With The Austofix F2 Femoral Nail For Peri-Trochanteric Femur Fractures.

L. Host
{"title":"Rural Experience With The Austofix F2 Femoral Nail For Peri-Trochanteric Femur Fractures.","authors":"L. Host","doi":"10.5580/2c55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rural health care provision is repeatedly substandard in comparison to that offered in urban settings, with many factors involved. Budgetary constraints, geographical limitations and professional isolation render best practice health care problematic. Sustainable, cost-effective health service provision is always the aim, but must constantly be tempered against evidence-based best practice. Our review aimed to highlight local experience with the Austofix F2 femoral nail for treatment of peri-trochanteric femur fractures, and to assess this relative to evidence-based best practice. The development of Z-deformity in 29% of patients requiring revision of implants in 26% has led to a change of implant usage at our institution, and raises questions of the utility of dual sliding screw systems for proximal femoral fracture management.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"65 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2c55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural health care provision is repeatedly substandard in comparison to that offered in urban settings, with many factors involved. Budgetary constraints, geographical limitations and professional isolation render best practice health care problematic. Sustainable, cost-effective health service provision is always the aim, but must constantly be tempered against evidence-based best practice. Our review aimed to highlight local experience with the Austofix F2 femoral nail for treatment of peri-trochanteric femur fractures, and to assess this relative to evidence-based best practice. The development of Z-deformity in 29% of patients requiring revision of implants in 26% has led to a change of implant usage at our institution, and raises questions of the utility of dual sliding screw systems for proximal femoral fracture management.
Austofix F2股骨钉治疗股骨粗隆周围骨折的农村经验。
与城市环境相比,农村提供的保健服务往往不达标,这涉及许多因素。预算限制、地理限制和专业隔离使最佳保健做法存在问题。提供可持续、具有成本效益的卫生服务始终是目标,但必须不断与循证最佳做法相对照。我们的综述旨在强调Austofix F2股钉治疗股骨粗隆周围骨折的局部经验,并评估其与循证最佳实践的关系。29%的患者出现z型畸形,26%的患者需要对植入物进行翻修,这导致了我们机构对植入物使用的改变,并提出了双滑动螺钉系统在股骨近端骨折治疗中的实用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信