FactRank: Developing automated claim detection for Dutch-language fact-checkers

Q1 Social Sciences
Bettina Berendt , Peter Burger , Rafael Hautekiet , Jan Jagers , Alexander Pleijter , Peter Van Aelst
{"title":"FactRank: Developing automated claim detection for Dutch-language fact-checkers","authors":"Bettina Berendt ,&nbsp;Peter Burger ,&nbsp;Rafael Hautekiet ,&nbsp;Jan Jagers ,&nbsp;Alexander Pleijter ,&nbsp;Peter Van Aelst","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fact-checking has always been a central task of journalism, but given the ever-growing amount and speed of news offline and online, as well as the growing amounts of misinformation and disinformation, it is becoming increasingly important to support human fact-checkers with (semi-)automated methods to make their work more efficient. Within fact-checking, the detection of check-worthy claims is a crucial initial step, since it limits the number of claims that require or deserve to be checked for their truthfulness.</p><p>In this paper, we present FactRank, a novel claim detection tool for journalists specifically created for the Dutch language. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and still the only such tool for Dutch. FactRank thus complements existing online claim detection tools for English and (a small number of) other languages. FactRank performs similarly to claim detection in ClaimBuster, the state-of-the-art fact-checking tool for English. Our comparisons with a human baseline also indicate that given how much even expert human fact-checkers disagree, there may be a natural “upper bound” on the accuracy of check-worthiness detection by machine-learning methods.</p><p>The specific quality of FactRank derives from the interdisciplinary and iterative process in which it was created, which includes not only a high-performance deep-learning neural network architecture, but also a principled approach to defining and operationalising the concept of check-worthiness via a detailed codebook. This codebook was created jointly by expert fact-checkers from the two countries that have Dutch as an official language (Belgium/Flanders and the Netherlands). We expect FactRank to be very useful exactly because of the way we defined check-worthiness, and because of how we have made this explicit and traceable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100113","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696420300549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Fact-checking has always been a central task of journalism, but given the ever-growing amount and speed of news offline and online, as well as the growing amounts of misinformation and disinformation, it is becoming increasingly important to support human fact-checkers with (semi-)automated methods to make their work more efficient. Within fact-checking, the detection of check-worthy claims is a crucial initial step, since it limits the number of claims that require or deserve to be checked for their truthfulness.

In this paper, we present FactRank, a novel claim detection tool for journalists specifically created for the Dutch language. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and still the only such tool for Dutch. FactRank thus complements existing online claim detection tools for English and (a small number of) other languages. FactRank performs similarly to claim detection in ClaimBuster, the state-of-the-art fact-checking tool for English. Our comparisons with a human baseline also indicate that given how much even expert human fact-checkers disagree, there may be a natural “upper bound” on the accuracy of check-worthiness detection by machine-learning methods.

The specific quality of FactRank derives from the interdisciplinary and iterative process in which it was created, which includes not only a high-performance deep-learning neural network architecture, but also a principled approach to defining and operationalising the concept of check-worthiness via a detailed codebook. This codebook was created jointly by expert fact-checkers from the two countries that have Dutch as an official language (Belgium/Flanders and the Netherlands). We expect FactRank to be very useful exactly because of the way we defined check-worthiness, and because of how we have made this explicit and traceable.

FactRank:为荷兰语事实核查员开发自动索赔检测
事实核查一直是新闻业的一项核心任务,但鉴于离线和在线新闻的数量和速度不断增长,以及错误信息和虚假信息的数量不断增加,用(半)自动化方法支持人类事实核查人员以提高他们的工作效率变得越来越重要。在事实核查中,发现值得核查的主张是至关重要的第一步,因为它限制了需要或值得核查其真实性的主张的数量。在本文中,我们介绍了FactRank,这是一种专门为荷兰语创建的记者索赔检测工具。据我们所知,这是荷兰第一个也是唯一一个这样的工具。因此,FactRank补充了现有的英语和(少数)其他语言的在线索赔检测工具。FactRank的功能类似于ClaimBuster(最先进的英语事实核查工具)中的索赔检测。我们与人类基线的比较也表明,考虑到即使是专家的人类事实检查员也不同意,机器学习方法的可检查性检测的准确性可能存在一个自然的“上限”。FactRank的特殊品质源于其创建过程中的跨学科和迭代过程,其中不仅包括高性能的深度学习神经网络架构,还包括通过详细的代码本定义和操作可检查性概念的原则方法。这本代码本是由两个以荷兰语为官方语言的国家(比利时/佛兰德斯和荷兰)的事实核查专家共同编写的。我们希望FactRank非常有用,正是因为我们定义了可检查性的方式,以及我们如何使其明确和可追溯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信