Effects of Exercise on Lumbopelvic Pain During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nicole Tombers, Margaret Grob, Kathryn Ollenburg, Molly Appicelli, Christine A. Cabelka
{"title":"Effects of Exercise on Lumbopelvic Pain During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Nicole Tombers, Margaret Grob, Kathryn Ollenburg, Molly Appicelli, Christine A. Cabelka","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: At least 50% of women experience lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy. Physical activity has moderate health benefits and no adverse outcomes for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Physically active pregnant women have lower pain intensities than sedentary women. It is not clear whether common exercise types are equally beneficial for the management of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of exercise on reducing lumbopelvic pain intensity in pregnant women. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Seven databases (CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were searched in October 2020 and again in February 2022. Studies investigating the effect of exercise on low back or pelvic pain in pregnant women were included, with no limitation on publication date. Primary data collected for quantitative analysis included pain intensity. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using individual study effect sizes (ES) using a random-effects model. Results: Initial search yielded 1,771 results and 21 articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. One article utilized 2 intervention groups and was counted as separate studies. Meta-analysis on 22 studies yielded a statistically significant and large ES, indicating exercise intervention during pregnancy results in significantly lower pain reports compared with usual prenatal care (overall ES = 2.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.35-2.78; P < .001). Conclusion: Exercise is beneficial in the management of lumbopelvic pain in pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":114037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At least 50% of women experience lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy. Physical activity has moderate health benefits and no adverse outcomes for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Physically active pregnant women have lower pain intensities than sedentary women. It is not clear whether common exercise types are equally beneficial for the management of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of exercise on reducing lumbopelvic pain intensity in pregnant women. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Seven databases (CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were searched in October 2020 and again in February 2022. Studies investigating the effect of exercise on low back or pelvic pain in pregnant women were included, with no limitation on publication date. Primary data collected for quantitative analysis included pain intensity. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using individual study effect sizes (ES) using a random-effects model. Results: Initial search yielded 1,771 results and 21 articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. One article utilized 2 intervention groups and was counted as separate studies. Meta-analysis on 22 studies yielded a statistically significant and large ES, indicating exercise intervention during pregnancy results in significantly lower pain reports compared with usual prenatal care (overall ES = 2.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.35-2.78; P < .001). Conclusion: Exercise is beneficial in the management of lumbopelvic pain in pregnant women.
运动对妊娠期腰骨盆疼痛的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:至少50%的妇女在怀孕期间经历腰盂疼痛。体育锻炼对没有并发症的怀孕妇女的健康有中等程度的好处,没有不良后果。经常运动的孕妇比久坐不动的孕妇疼痛强度低。目前尚不清楚常见的运动类型是否对妊娠期腰骨盆疼痛的治疗同样有益。目的:本系统综述的目的是确定运动对减轻孕妇腰盆腔疼痛强度的影响。研究设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:分别于2020年10月和2022年2月检索7个数据库(CINAHL、Medline、ScienceDirect、SportDiscus、ProQuest、Google Scholar和Cochrane)。调查运动对孕妇腰痛或盆腔疼痛影响的研究被纳入,没有发表日期限制。定量分析收集的主要数据包括疼痛强度。使用Cochrane偏倚工具评估偏倚。采用随机效应模型,采用个体研究效应量(ES)进行meta分析。结果:初步检索得到1771条结果,其中21篇文章符合纳入标准。一篇文章使用了2个干预组,并被视为单独的研究。对22项研究的荟萃分析得出了具有统计学意义的大ES,表明与常规产前护理相比,孕期运动干预导致的疼痛报告显著降低(总ES = 2.07;95%置信区间= 1.35-2.78;P < 0.001)。结论:运动对妊娠期腰盂疼痛的治疗有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信