{"title":"La acción directa y el derecho de defensa del asegurado (The Direct Redress Against the Insurer and the Insured’ Right of Defense)","authors":"Diana Ariza Sánchez","doi":"10.18601/16923960.v18n1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b> No hay duda que dentro de la normativa colombiana, la consagración de la acción directa en contra de las aseguradoras constituye un mecanismo práctico y garantista, que les facilita a las víctimas de eventos constitutivos de responsabilidad civil un acceso menos tortuoso a la realización del derecho a la reparación integral. No obstante, el ejercicio de dicha acción acarrea una serie de problemáticas procesales y sustanciales de cara al asegurado (civilmente responsable), cuya resolución dista de ser pacífica. Particularmente, dichas dificultades se sintetizan en la necesidad o no de integrar en el contradictorio al asegurado, como quiera que su responsabilidad civil será un punto insoslayable de controversia en el litigio entablado en contra de la aseguradora. El presente artículo pretende explorar el marco jurídico que permite comprender correctamente la anotada dificultad, así como proponer una respuesta al mismo, desde la perspectiva del derecho colombiano.<br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> There is no doubt that the legal standing that the Colombian law establish for the victim of a tort, in order to file a legal claim against the insurer of civil liability, constitutes a practical and beneficial mechanism, which facilitates such victims a less tortuous access to their right to a full compensation. However, such legal standing takes to a series of substantial and procedural issues regarding the insured (tortfeasor), which answer is far from being pacific in the Colombian legal systems. Particularly, such problems can be synthetized in the need or not of calling the insured to the judicial proceedings, due to the fact that his civil liability will be an unavoidable legal issue in the litigation initiated against the insurer. The present article pretends to explore the legal frame that allows to correctly comprehend the said difficulty, as to propose an answer to it, from the Colombian law perspective.","PeriodicalId":320322,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Tort Litigation","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Tort Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18601/16923960.v18n1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: No hay duda que dentro de la normativa colombiana, la consagración de la acción directa en contra de las aseguradoras constituye un mecanismo práctico y garantista, que les facilita a las víctimas de eventos constitutivos de responsabilidad civil un acceso menos tortuoso a la realización del derecho a la reparación integral. No obstante, el ejercicio de dicha acción acarrea una serie de problemáticas procesales y sustanciales de cara al asegurado (civilmente responsable), cuya resolución dista de ser pacífica. Particularmente, dichas dificultades se sintetizan en la necesidad o no de integrar en el contradictorio al asegurado, como quiera que su responsabilidad civil será un punto insoslayable de controversia en el litigio entablado en contra de la aseguradora. El presente artículo pretende explorar el marco jurídico que permite comprender correctamente la anotada dificultad, así como proponer una respuesta al mismo, desde la perspectiva del derecho colombiano.
English Abstract: There is no doubt that the legal standing that the Colombian law establish for the victim of a tort, in order to file a legal claim against the insurer of civil liability, constitutes a practical and beneficial mechanism, which facilitates such victims a less tortuous access to their right to a full compensation. However, such legal standing takes to a series of substantial and procedural issues regarding the insured (tortfeasor), which answer is far from being pacific in the Colombian legal systems. Particularly, such problems can be synthetized in the need or not of calling the insured to the judicial proceedings, due to the fact that his civil liability will be an unavoidable legal issue in the litigation initiated against the insurer. The present article pretends to explore the legal frame that allows to correctly comprehend the said difficulty, as to propose an answer to it, from the Colombian law perspective.
[Abstract:毫无疑问,在哥伦比亚,规范保险公司直接行动的奉献,是一种基于权利的切实机制组成事件受害者提供其民事责任少迂回获得权的实现全面维修。然而,这一行动的行使给被保险人(民事责任)带来了一系列程序性和实质性的问题,这些问题远未和平解决。特别是,这些困难归结为是否需要将被保险人纳入对抗性索赔,因为他的民事责任将是针对保险公司的诉讼中不可避免的争议点。本文试图从哥伦比亚法律的角度探讨允许正确理解这一困难的法律框架,并提出对这一问题的回应。English Abstract: There is没有疑问that the legal常务that the派law设立for the受害人of a tort法律,in order to file a claim against the insurer of民事责任,构成practical and有益机制,which facilitates此类受害者较tortuous access to their right to a full的赔偿。然而,这种法律地位涉及一系列与投保人有关的实质性和程序性问题(tortfeasor),哥伦比亚法律制度对这些问题的回答远不是太平洋问题。具体而言,这类问题可以归结为是否需要将投保人诉诸司法程序,因为在针对投保人的诉讼中,其民事责任将是不可避免的法律问题。本文旨在探讨能够正确理解上述困难的法律框架,并从哥伦比亚法律的角度提出答案。