Potential Patient Bias by Insurance Coverage on CG-CAHPS Surveys: Impact on Physician Reimbursement

D. Hayward, Caleb Hawkes, C. Perry, W. D. de Riese, M. Zumwalt
{"title":"Potential Patient Bias by Insurance Coverage on CG-CAHPS Surveys: Impact on Physician Reimbursement","authors":"D. Hayward, Caleb Hawkes, C. Perry, W. D. de Riese, M. Zumwalt","doi":"10.55576/job.v2i3.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Investigate the relationship between payor type and patient experience scores.\nDesign: Cross-sectional retrospective study.\nSetting: Academic orthopaedic outpatient clinic.\nPatients: All patients seen in our clinic were given a Press Ganey survey. 2,934 surveys were collected between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020.\nIntervention: Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey overall satisfaction with physician.\nMain outcome measurement: Physician overall rating by patients stratified according to payor type.\nResults and conclusions: Medicare patients reported the highest satisfaction scores (91.98 ± 0.06), followed by Worker’s Compensation (90.49 ± 0.12), other government coverage (89.91 ± 0.45), commercial insurance (89.36 ± 0.12), Medicaid (88.74 ± 0.30), and self-pay/uncompensated (88.26 ± 0.48). ANOVA analysis resulted in an F value of 270.2205 (p < 0.001). Tukey-Kramer demonstrated statistically significant difference between the means of all payor groups except Medicaid vs. self-pay/uncompensated.\nOur data indicates that patient experience scores are influenced by payor type. These biases may negatively impact physician reimbursement, even in the setting of high-quality care. Thus, orthopedic physicians should be mindful of payor type bias when selecting MIPS quality reporting metrics, and policymakers should consider adjusting reimbursement models according to payor-mix.\nLevel of Evidence: Level III\nKeywords: Business, Insurance, Patient Bias, Reimbursement\n(J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 2, Issue 3:pages 1-4)","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i3.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Investigate the relationship between payor type and patient experience scores. Design: Cross-sectional retrospective study. Setting: Academic orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Patients: All patients seen in our clinic were given a Press Ganey survey. 2,934 surveys were collected between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Intervention: Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey overall satisfaction with physician. Main outcome measurement: Physician overall rating by patients stratified according to payor type. Results and conclusions: Medicare patients reported the highest satisfaction scores (91.98 ± 0.06), followed by Worker’s Compensation (90.49 ± 0.12), other government coverage (89.91 ± 0.45), commercial insurance (89.36 ± 0.12), Medicaid (88.74 ± 0.30), and self-pay/uncompensated (88.26 ± 0.48). ANOVA analysis resulted in an F value of 270.2205 (p < 0.001). Tukey-Kramer demonstrated statistically significant difference between the means of all payor groups except Medicaid vs. self-pay/uncompensated. Our data indicates that patient experience scores are influenced by payor type. These biases may negatively impact physician reimbursement, even in the setting of high-quality care. Thus, orthopedic physicians should be mindful of payor type bias when selecting MIPS quality reporting metrics, and policymakers should consider adjusting reimbursement models according to payor-mix. Level of Evidence: Level III Keywords: Business, Insurance, Patient Bias, Reimbursement (J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 2, Issue 3:pages 1-4)
CG-CAHPS调查中潜在的患者偏见:对医生报销的影响
目的:探讨付款人类型与患者体验评分之间的关系。设计:横断面回顾性研究。单位:学术骨科门诊。病人:所有在我们诊所就诊的病人都接受了Press Ganey调查。2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间收集了2934份调查。干预:按Ganey患者满意度调查对医生的总体满意度。主要结果测量:医生根据付款人类型对患者进行分层的总体评分。结果与结论:医保患者满意度得分最高(91.98±0.06),其次是工伤保险(90.49±0.12)、其他政府保险(89.91±0.45)、商业保险(89.36±0.12)、医疗补助(88.74±0.30)和自费/无偿(88.26±0.48)。方差分析的F值为270.2205 (p < 0.001)。Tukey-Kramer证明了除医疗补助与自费/无偿外所有支付者群体之间的统计显著差异。我们的数据表明,患者体验得分是受付款人类型的影响。这些偏见可能会对医生报销产生负面影响,即使是在高质量护理的情况下。因此,骨科医生在选择MIPS质量报告指标时应注意付款人类型偏差,政策制定者应考虑根据付款人组合调整报销模式。关键词:商业、保险、患者偏见、报销(J Ortho Business 2022;第2卷,第3期:1-4页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信