Book Review—Michael P. McCauley, NPR: The Trials and Triumphs of National Public Radio

Michael W. Huntsberger
{"title":"Book Review—Michael P. McCauley, NPR: The Trials and Triumphs of National Public Radio","authors":"Michael W. Huntsberger","doi":"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the institution of National Public Radio (NPR) is widely esteemed by educators, journalists, and certain sectors of the American public, the network has always occupied a fairly ambiguous position in U.S. mass media. A by-product of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society initiatives, NPR has persevered in the environment of a vehemently commercial industry to achieve preeminent status in American radio news. In NPR, McCauley charts the network’s beginnings and its rise to prominence, and he analyzes the company’s contributions to American mass media and society. Exhibiting his skills as a reporter, McCauley draws on an extensive body of original oral histories, historic texts, and contemporary sources to weave a concise institutional history of the “lyceum of the airwaves” (p. 1). NPR provides a tight, fact-laden account of the network’s founders, leaders, and most recognizable personalities. For the most part, McCauley forgoes discussion of the political and cultural forces that led to the formation of the network (such as the influence of the BBC as a model for news coverage). Similarly, McCauley does not attempt to chronicle the history of NPR’s many programs or the influences that programs such as All Things Considered and Performance Today have had on American culture. Rather, he undertakes a brisk, chronological account of the company’s development, followed by summative analysis of the network’s importance as a mass media institution. McCauley is at his best when he narrates the central political issues that have shaped NPR—the tussles over the network’s intended mission, the tension between news and arts programming, and the ever-present questions about the nature and size of its audience. He effectively captures the strong personalities of some of the founders, distilling the conflicts over program production and control that arose at the network’s creation. He does a particularly good job of delineating the causes and effects of NPR’s debt crisis in 1983, offering a balanced narrative that covers both the management issues and the surrounding circumstances of this pivotal event in the network’s history. McCauley is equally good when he discusses the concepts of brand equity and loyalty, and the network’s evolving approach to audience identification and marketing. The conclusion is a sophisticated and well-reasoned justification of how NPR serves listeners. McCauley argues that NPR has not only succeeded but also excelled in its efforts to serve its intended audience. He makes it clear, however, that he is a fan and a member of the particular demographic that finds NPR appealing. Although his candor lends authenticity to the analysis, McCauley’s descriptions of “NPR’s Stars” occasionally exhibit a quality of reverence. However, these moments are sparse in the context of the entire book. Although McCauley admits that he is a textbook example","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the institution of National Public Radio (NPR) is widely esteemed by educators, journalists, and certain sectors of the American public, the network has always occupied a fairly ambiguous position in U.S. mass media. A by-product of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society initiatives, NPR has persevered in the environment of a vehemently commercial industry to achieve preeminent status in American radio news. In NPR, McCauley charts the network’s beginnings and its rise to prominence, and he analyzes the company’s contributions to American mass media and society. Exhibiting his skills as a reporter, McCauley draws on an extensive body of original oral histories, historic texts, and contemporary sources to weave a concise institutional history of the “lyceum of the airwaves” (p. 1). NPR provides a tight, fact-laden account of the network’s founders, leaders, and most recognizable personalities. For the most part, McCauley forgoes discussion of the political and cultural forces that led to the formation of the network (such as the influence of the BBC as a model for news coverage). Similarly, McCauley does not attempt to chronicle the history of NPR’s many programs or the influences that programs such as All Things Considered and Performance Today have had on American culture. Rather, he undertakes a brisk, chronological account of the company’s development, followed by summative analysis of the network’s importance as a mass media institution. McCauley is at his best when he narrates the central political issues that have shaped NPR—the tussles over the network’s intended mission, the tension between news and arts programming, and the ever-present questions about the nature and size of its audience. He effectively captures the strong personalities of some of the founders, distilling the conflicts over program production and control that arose at the network’s creation. He does a particularly good job of delineating the causes and effects of NPR’s debt crisis in 1983, offering a balanced narrative that covers both the management issues and the surrounding circumstances of this pivotal event in the network’s history. McCauley is equally good when he discusses the concepts of brand equity and loyalty, and the network’s evolving approach to audience identification and marketing. The conclusion is a sophisticated and well-reasoned justification of how NPR serves listeners. McCauley argues that NPR has not only succeeded but also excelled in its efforts to serve its intended audience. He makes it clear, however, that he is a fan and a member of the particular demographic that finds NPR appealing. Although his candor lends authenticity to the analysis, McCauley’s descriptions of “NPR’s Stars” occasionally exhibit a quality of reverence. However, these moments are sparse in the context of the entire book. Although McCauley admits that he is a textbook example
书评——迈克尔·p·麦考利,《美国国家公共广播电台:国家公共广播电台的考验与胜利》
尽管美国国家公共广播电台(NPR)受到教育工作者、新闻工作者和部分美国公众的广泛尊重,但该网络在美国大众媒体中一直占据着相当模糊的地位。作为林登·约翰逊“伟大社会”倡议的副产品,NPR在激烈的商业环境中坚持不懈,在美国广播新闻中取得了卓越的地位。在美国国家公共电台节目中,麦考利描绘了该网络的起源和崛起,并分析了该公司对美国大众媒体和社会的贡献。麦考利展示了他作为一名记者的技巧,他借鉴了大量的原始口述历史、历史文本和当代资料,编织了一部简明的“广播学院”制度史(第1页)。美国国家公共电台(NPR)对该网络的创始人、领导人和最知名的人物进行了严密、翔实的描述。在很大程度上,麦考利放弃了对导致网络形成的政治和文化力量的讨论(例如BBC作为新闻报道模式的影响)。同样,麦考利并没有试图记录美国国家公共电台众多节目的历史,也没有试图记录诸如《All Things Considered》和《今日表演》等节目对美国文化的影响。相反,他对该公司的发展进行了轻快的、按时间顺序的叙述,然后对该网络作为大众媒体机构的重要性进行了总结性分析。麦考利在讲述塑造npr的核心政治问题时表现得淋漓尽致——围绕该网络的既定使命的争论,新闻和艺术节目之间的紧张关系,以及关于其观众的性质和规模的始终存在的问题。他有效地捕捉到了一些创始人的强烈个性,提炼出了网络创建时出现的节目制作和控制方面的冲突。他在描述1983年美国国家公共电台债务危机的原因和影响方面做得特别好,提供了一个平衡的叙述,既涵盖了管理问题,也涵盖了网络历史上这一关键事件的周围环境。McCauley在讨论品牌资产和忠诚度的概念,以及网络在受众识别和营销方面不断发展的方法时也同样出色。结论是对NPR如何服务听众的一个成熟而合理的论证。麦考利认为,美国国家公共电台在服务目标受众方面不仅取得了成功,而且表现出色。然而,他明确表示,他是NPR的粉丝,也是觉得NPR有吸引力的特定人群中的一员。尽管麦考利的坦率为他的分析增添了真实性,但他对《NPR之星》的描述偶尔也会流露出一种敬畏之情。然而,在整本书的背景下,这些时刻是稀疏的。尽管麦考利承认他是一个典型的例子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信