The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions.

T. McDowell, D. Welcome, C. Warren, Xueyan S. Xu, R. Dong
{"title":"The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions.","authors":"T. McDowell, D. Welcome, C. Warren, Xueyan S. Xu, R. Dong","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mev084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical arm systems are commonly used to support powered hand tools to alleviate ergonomic stressors related to the development of workplace musculoskeletal disorders. However, the use of these systems can increase exposure times to other potentially harmful agents such as hand-transmitted vibration. To examine how these tool support systems affect tool vibration, the primary objectives of this study were to characterize the vibration emissions of typical portable pneumatic grinders used for surface grinding with and without a mechanical arm support system at a workplace and to estimate the potential risk of the increased vibration exposure time afforded by the use of these mechanical arm systems. This study also developed a laboratory-based simulated grinding task based on the ISO 28927-1 (2009) standard for assessing grinder vibrations; the simulated grinding vibrations were compared with those measured during actual workplace grinder operations. The results of this study demonstrate that use of the mechanical arm may provide a health benefit by reducing the forces required to lift and maneuver the tools and by decreasing hand-transmitted vibration exposure. However, the arm does not substantially change the basic characteristics of grinder vibration spectra. The mechanical arm reduced the average frequency-weighted acceleration by about 24% in the workplace and by about 7% in the laboratory. Because use of the mechanical arm system can increase daily time-on-task by 50% or more, the use of such systems may actually increase daily time-weighted hand-transmitted vibration exposures in some cases. The laboratory acceleration measurements were substantially lower than the workplace measurements, and the laboratory tool rankings based on acceleration were considerably different than those from the workplace. Thus, it is doubtful that ISO 28927-1 is useful for estimating workplace grinder vibration exposures or for predicting workplace grinder acceleration rank orders.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Mechanical arm systems are commonly used to support powered hand tools to alleviate ergonomic stressors related to the development of workplace musculoskeletal disorders. However, the use of these systems can increase exposure times to other potentially harmful agents such as hand-transmitted vibration. To examine how these tool support systems affect tool vibration, the primary objectives of this study were to characterize the vibration emissions of typical portable pneumatic grinders used for surface grinding with and without a mechanical arm support system at a workplace and to estimate the potential risk of the increased vibration exposure time afforded by the use of these mechanical arm systems. This study also developed a laboratory-based simulated grinding task based on the ISO 28927-1 (2009) standard for assessing grinder vibrations; the simulated grinding vibrations were compared with those measured during actual workplace grinder operations. The results of this study demonstrate that use of the mechanical arm may provide a health benefit by reducing the forces required to lift and maneuver the tools and by decreasing hand-transmitted vibration exposure. However, the arm does not substantially change the basic characteristics of grinder vibration spectra. The mechanical arm reduced the average frequency-weighted acceleration by about 24% in the workplace and by about 7% in the laboratory. Because use of the mechanical arm system can increase daily time-on-task by 50% or more, the use of such systems may actually increase daily time-weighted hand-transmitted vibration exposures in some cases. The laboratory acceleration measurements were substantially lower than the workplace measurements, and the laboratory tool rankings based on acceleration were considerably different than those from the workplace. Thus, it is doubtful that ISO 28927-1 is useful for estimating workplace grinder vibration exposures or for predicting workplace grinder acceleration rank orders.
机械臂系统对便携式磨床振动排放的影响。
机械臂系统通常用于支持电动手动工具,以减轻与工作场所肌肉骨骼疾病发展相关的人体工程学压力源。然而,使用这些系统会增加暴露于其他潜在有害物质的时间,如手传振动。为了研究这些工具支撑系统如何影响工具振动,本研究的主要目标是表征在工作场所使用机械臂支撑系统和不使用机械臂支撑系统进行表面磨削的典型便携式气动磨床的振动排放,并估计使用这些机械臂系统所增加的振动暴露时间的潜在风险。本研究还基于评估磨床振动的ISO 28927-1(2009)标准开发了基于实验室的模拟磨削任务;将模拟的磨削振动与实际工作场所磨床振动进行了比较。本研究的结果表明,使用机械臂可以减少抬起和操纵工具所需的力,并减少手传递的振动,从而对健康有益。然而,手臂并没有实质性地改变磨床振动谱的基本特征。机械臂在工作场所将平均频率加权加速度降低了约24%,在实验室中降低了约7%。由于机械臂系统的使用可以将每日任务完成时间提高50%或更多,因此在某些情况下,使用此类系统实际上可能会增加每日时间加权的手传振动暴露。实验室加速度测量值明显低于工作场所测量值,并且基于加速度的实验室工具排名与工作场所的工具排名有很大不同。因此,ISO 28927-1对于估计工作场所磨床振动暴露或预测工作场所磨床加速度等级顺序是否有用是值得怀疑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信