Evaluation of Sampling Algorithms for a Pairwise Subjective Assessment Methodology

Shima Mohammadi, J. Ascenso
{"title":"Evaluation of Sampling Algorithms for a Pairwise Subjective Assessment Methodology","authors":"Shima Mohammadi, J. Ascenso","doi":"10.1109/ISM55400.2022.10040647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subjective assessment tests are often employed to evaluate image processing systems, notably image and video compression, super-resolution among others and have been used as an indisputable way to provide evidence of the performance of an algorithm or system. While several methodologies can be used in a subjective quality assessment test, pairwise comparison tests are nowadays attracting a lot of attention due to their accuracy and simplicity. However, the number of comparisons in a pairwise comparison test increases quadratically with the number of stimuli and thus often leads to very long tests, which is impractical for many cases. However, not all the pairs contribute equally to the final score and thus, it is possible to reduce the number of comparisons without degrading the final accuracy. To do so, pairwise sampling methods are often used to select the pairs which provide more information about the quality of each stimuli. In this paper, a reliable and much-needed evaluation procedure is proposed and used for already available methods in the literature, especially considering the case of subjective evaluation of image and video codecs. The results indicate that an appropriate selection of the pairs allows to achieve very reliable scores while requiring the comparison of a much lower number of pairs.","PeriodicalId":112060,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM55400.2022.10040647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Subjective assessment tests are often employed to evaluate image processing systems, notably image and video compression, super-resolution among others and have been used as an indisputable way to provide evidence of the performance of an algorithm or system. While several methodologies can be used in a subjective quality assessment test, pairwise comparison tests are nowadays attracting a lot of attention due to their accuracy and simplicity. However, the number of comparisons in a pairwise comparison test increases quadratically with the number of stimuli and thus often leads to very long tests, which is impractical for many cases. However, not all the pairs contribute equally to the final score and thus, it is possible to reduce the number of comparisons without degrading the final accuracy. To do so, pairwise sampling methods are often used to select the pairs which provide more information about the quality of each stimuli. In this paper, a reliable and much-needed evaluation procedure is proposed and used for already available methods in the literature, especially considering the case of subjective evaluation of image and video codecs. The results indicate that an appropriate selection of the pairs allows to achieve very reliable scores while requiring the comparison of a much lower number of pairs.
两两主观评价方法的抽样算法评价
主观评估测试通常用于评估图像处理系统,特别是图像和视频压缩,超分辨率等,并已被用作提供算法或系统性能证据的无可争议的方式。虽然在主观质量评估测试中可以使用几种方法,但两两比较测试由于其准确性和简单性而引起了人们的广泛关注。然而,在两两比较测试中,比较的次数随着刺激的数量呈二次增长,因此经常导致很长的测试,这在许多情况下是不切实际的。然而,并不是所有的配对对最终分数都有相同的贡献,因此,在不降低最终准确性的情况下减少比较的次数是可能的。为了做到这一点,通常使用成对抽样方法来选择能够提供有关每个刺激质量的更多信息的成对。本文提出了一种可靠且急需的评估程序,并用于文献中已有的方法,特别是考虑到图像和视频编解码器的主观评估情况。结果表明,适当的配对选择可以获得非常可靠的分数,而需要比较的配对数量要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信