Towards Assessing Representativeness of Fault Injection-Generated Failure Data for Online Failure Prediction

Ivano Irrera, M. Vieira
{"title":"Towards Assessing Representativeness of Fault Injection-Generated Failure Data for Online Failure Prediction","authors":"Ivano Irrera, M. Vieira","doi":"10.1109/DSN-W.2015.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online Failure Prediction allows improving system dependability by foreseeing incoming failures at runtime, enabling mitigation actions to be taken in advance, though prediction systems' learning and assessing is hard due to the scarcity of failure data. Realistic software fault injection has been identified as a valid solution for addressing the scarcity of failure data, as injecting software faults (the most occurring on computer systems) increases the probability of a system to fail, hence allowing the collection of failure-related data in short time. Moreover, realistic injection permits the emulation of software faults likely to exist in the target system after its deployment. However, besides the representativeness of the software faults injected is recognized as a necessary condition for generating valid failure data, studies on the representativeness of generated failure-related data has still not been addressed. In this work we present a preliminary study towards the assessment the representativeness of failure-related data by using G-SWFIT realistic software fault injection technique. We here address the definition of concepts and metrics for the representativeness estimation and assessment.","PeriodicalId":202329,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN-W.2015.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Online Failure Prediction allows improving system dependability by foreseeing incoming failures at runtime, enabling mitigation actions to be taken in advance, though prediction systems' learning and assessing is hard due to the scarcity of failure data. Realistic software fault injection has been identified as a valid solution for addressing the scarcity of failure data, as injecting software faults (the most occurring on computer systems) increases the probability of a system to fail, hence allowing the collection of failure-related data in short time. Moreover, realistic injection permits the emulation of software faults likely to exist in the target system after its deployment. However, besides the representativeness of the software faults injected is recognized as a necessary condition for generating valid failure data, studies on the representativeness of generated failure-related data has still not been addressed. In this work we present a preliminary study towards the assessment the representativeness of failure-related data by using G-SWFIT realistic software fault injection technique. We here address the definition of concepts and metrics for the representativeness estimation and assessment.
在线故障预测中故障注入生成的故障数据的代表性评估
在线故障预测可以通过在运行时预测即将到来的故障来提高系统的可靠性,从而提前采取缓解措施,尽管由于故障数据的缺乏,预测系统的学习和评估很困难。实际的软件故障注入已被确定为解决故障数据稀缺的有效解决方案,因为注入软件故障(在计算机系统上最常见)增加了系统失败的可能性,因此允许在短时间内收集与故障相关的数据。此外,逼真的注入允许模拟部署后目标系统中可能存在的软件故障。然而,除了注入的软件故障的代表性被认为是生成有效故障数据的必要条件外,对生成的故障相关数据的代表性的研究仍然没有得到解决。在这项工作中,我们对使用G-SWFIT现实软件故障注入技术评估故障相关数据的代表性进行了初步研究。我们在这里讨论代表性估计和评估的概念和度量的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信