On the power of the compass (or, why mazes are easier to search than graphs)

M. Blum, D. Kozen
{"title":"On the power of the compass (or, why mazes are easier to search than graphs)","authors":"M. Blum, D. Kozen","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1978.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"About the same time, A.N. Shah gave a finite autom~ton with 5 pebbles which could search an arbitrary maze (the autonlaton may drop a pebble on a cell it is visiting, then upon returning to that cell later on can sense the pebble's presence, and if desired pick it up and move it to a new cell). Shah also conjectured that fewer than 5 pebbles would not suffice. The first of our two main results is that, contrary to Shah's conjecture, the search can be implemented with just two pebbles. The question is still open whether a finite automaton with just one pebble can search any maze.","PeriodicalId":346837,"journal":{"name":"19th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1978)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"199","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1978)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1978.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 199

Abstract

About the same time, A.N. Shah gave a finite autom~ton with 5 pebbles which could search an arbitrary maze (the autonlaton may drop a pebble on a cell it is visiting, then upon returning to that cell later on can sense the pebble's presence, and if desired pick it up and move it to a new cell). Shah also conjectured that fewer than 5 pebbles would not suffice. The first of our two main results is that, contrary to Shah's conjecture, the search can be implemented with just two pebbles. The question is still open whether a finite automaton with just one pebble can search any maze.
关于指南针的力量(或者,为什么迷宫比图表更容易搜索)
大约在同一时间,A.N. Shah给出了一个有限的自动机器人,它有5个鹅卵石,可以搜索任意的迷宫(自动机器人可能会把鹅卵石扔到它正在访问的细胞上,然后在稍后返回该细胞时可以感知鹅卵石的存在,如果需要的话,可以把它捡起来并移动到一个新的细胞)。沙阿还推测,少于5个鹅卵石是不够的。我们的两个主要结果中的第一个是,与沙阿的猜想相反,搜索可以只用两个鹅卵石来实现。一个只有一块鹅卵石的有限自动机是否能搜索任何迷宫,这个问题仍然悬而未决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信