Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification

A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton
{"title":"Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification","authors":"A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.","PeriodicalId":399042,"journal":{"name":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":"48 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.
为顺序验证记录合成历史
单独执行合成和验证有两个不良后果:(1)验证有变得难以处理的风险,(2)由于难以验证而没有应用强顺序优化。本文提出了一种记录合成信息的格式和一种利用合成反馈进行顺序等效性检查的方法。描述了一种实现,并与不使用合成信息的高效通用顺序等效检查器进行了实验比较。实验结果证实了对大型设计的等效性检查在运行时间和可靠性方面的预期节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信