Aortic laceration during veress needle insertion: a laparoscopic disaster

M. Machado
{"title":"Aortic laceration during veress needle insertion: a laparoscopic disaster","authors":"M. Machado","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: More than 50% of all complications associated with laparoscopy occur during the entry phase for pneumoperitoneum and insertion of trocars. Major vascular injuries related to blind entry technique are infrequent, occurring in 0.04–0.1% of laparoscopic procedures. Nevertheless, 13%–50% of all vascular injuries are not detected immediately during the operation, resulting in correspondingly high morbidity and mortality rates. Major vascular injuries are the second most common cause of death during laparoscopy, after death from anesthesia, with a mortality rate of 6.37 %. The first reaction after vascular injury should not be conversion to laparotomy, but instead assessment and possible control of the injury. Obesity, previous abdominal surgeries, surgical experience, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic inflammatory disease are known risk factors to injuries during the entry phase in laparoscopy. Clinical case: A 47 years old woman, BMI 42.2 kg/m2, without any previous abdominal surgery, was proposed to an elective left hemicolectomy after 2 diverticulitis episodes in a 6 months period, at a secondary hospital. As soon as the Veress needle was inserted, blood was seen. After the first trocar was placed, an median retroperitoneal inframesogastric hematoma was seen and the surgeon did an unsuccessful attempt to control the bleeding. Since there was hemodynamic instability, a conversion was made. An infrarrenal aortic laceration was seen and clamps were put in place to stop the bleeding. The patient was then transferred to a tertiary hospital to be intervened by vascular surgery. An aortoplasty with patch of the great safenous vein and trombectomy of the ilio-distal arteries was performed. The time occurred between the injury and the beginning of the vascular surgery was 2hours. The patient went to an Intensive Care Unit. A total of 15 red blood cells pool (first 2 without compatibility test), 12 plasma units, 3grams of fibrinogen and 1 pool of plaquelets were transfused. During the intensive care stay, the patient developed leg compartment syndrome, with the need of fasciectomy and a moderate ARDS, making it harder to manage the disease. Conclusion: Major Vascular lesions in laparoscopy surgery are rare but are associated with great morbidity and mortality. A close cooperation between laparoscopic surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons and intensivists is needed to minimize the damage and the improve the result of the vascular repair. The existence of strict action protocols is necessary to minimize morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":228896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: More than 50% of all complications associated with laparoscopy occur during the entry phase for pneumoperitoneum and insertion of trocars. Major vascular injuries related to blind entry technique are infrequent, occurring in 0.04–0.1% of laparoscopic procedures. Nevertheless, 13%–50% of all vascular injuries are not detected immediately during the operation, resulting in correspondingly high morbidity and mortality rates. Major vascular injuries are the second most common cause of death during laparoscopy, after death from anesthesia, with a mortality rate of 6.37 %. The first reaction after vascular injury should not be conversion to laparotomy, but instead assessment and possible control of the injury. Obesity, previous abdominal surgeries, surgical experience, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic inflammatory disease are known risk factors to injuries during the entry phase in laparoscopy. Clinical case: A 47 years old woman, BMI 42.2 kg/m2, without any previous abdominal surgery, was proposed to an elective left hemicolectomy after 2 diverticulitis episodes in a 6 months period, at a secondary hospital. As soon as the Veress needle was inserted, blood was seen. After the first trocar was placed, an median retroperitoneal inframesogastric hematoma was seen and the surgeon did an unsuccessful attempt to control the bleeding. Since there was hemodynamic instability, a conversion was made. An infrarrenal aortic laceration was seen and clamps were put in place to stop the bleeding. The patient was then transferred to a tertiary hospital to be intervened by vascular surgery. An aortoplasty with patch of the great safenous vein and trombectomy of the ilio-distal arteries was performed. The time occurred between the injury and the beginning of the vascular surgery was 2hours. The patient went to an Intensive Care Unit. A total of 15 red blood cells pool (first 2 without compatibility test), 12 plasma units, 3grams of fibrinogen and 1 pool of plaquelets were transfused. During the intensive care stay, the patient developed leg compartment syndrome, with the need of fasciectomy and a moderate ARDS, making it harder to manage the disease. Conclusion: Major Vascular lesions in laparoscopy surgery are rare but are associated with great morbidity and mortality. A close cooperation between laparoscopic surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons and intensivists is needed to minimize the damage and the improve the result of the vascular repair. The existence of strict action protocols is necessary to minimize morbidity and mortality.
在静脉针插入主动脉撕裂:腹腔镜灾难
导读:超过50%的腹腔镜相关并发症发生在气腹和插入套管针的起始阶段。与盲入技术相关的重大血管损伤并不常见,发生率为0.04-0.1%。然而,13%-50%的血管损伤不能在手术中立即发现,导致相应的高发病率和死亡率。大血管损伤是腹腔镜手术死亡的第二大常见原因,死亡率为6.37%,仅次于麻醉死亡。血管损伤后的第一反应不应转为剖腹手术,而应评估并可能控制损伤。肥胖、既往腹部手术、手术经验、炎症性肠病和盆腔炎是腹腔镜手术进入期损伤的已知危险因素。临床病例:47岁女性,BMI 42.2 kg/m2,既往无腹部手术史,6个月内2次憩室炎发作,在二级医院择期行左结肠切除术。韦里斯的针一插进去,就看到了血。在放置第一个套管针后,发现腹膜后正中胃下血肿,外科医生试图控制出血,但没有成功。由于血流动力学不稳定,进行了转换。发现肾下主动脉撕裂,用夹子止血。病人随后被转到三级医院接受血管手术。行主动脉成形术及大静脉补片及髂远端动脉切除。从受伤到血管手术开始的时间为2小时。病人被送进了重症监护室。共输注红细胞池15个(前2个无配伍试验)、血浆12个单位、纤维蛋白原3克、血小板1个池。在重症监护期间,患者出现腿筋膜室综合征,需要行筋膜切除术和中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征,使病情更难控制。结论:大血管病变在腹腔镜手术中是罕见的,但有很高的发病率和死亡率。腹腔镜外科医生、麻醉师、血管外科医生和重症监护医师需要密切合作,以尽量减少损伤,提高血管修复的效果。严格的行动方案的存在是必要的,以尽量减少发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信