{"title":"The Comprehensive Measure of Meaning","authors":"Jeffrey Hanson, T. VanderWeele","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological researchers have advanced several instruments to measure meaning. Philosophers have debated the objective versus subjective status of meaning in life and on the global versus individual or personal aspects of meaning. In this chapter, the authors make use of an emerging consensus in the psychology literature concerning a tripartite structure of meaning as cognitive coherence, affective significance, and motivational direction. They enrich this understanding with important philosophical distinctions to distinguish subdomains within this tripartite understanding. The authors use relevant philosophical distinctions to classify existing measurement items into a seven-fold structure intended to more comprehensively assess an individual’s sense of meaning. The proposed measure, with three items in each subdomain drawn from previous scales, constitutes what is put forward as the Comprehensive Measure of Meaning to hopefully enrich the empirical research on the assessment of, and on the causes and effects of, having a sense of meaning.","PeriodicalId":423496,"journal":{"name":"Measuring Well-Being","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measuring Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychological researchers have advanced several instruments to measure meaning. Philosophers have debated the objective versus subjective status of meaning in life and on the global versus individual or personal aspects of meaning. In this chapter, the authors make use of an emerging consensus in the psychology literature concerning a tripartite structure of meaning as cognitive coherence, affective significance, and motivational direction. They enrich this understanding with important philosophical distinctions to distinguish subdomains within this tripartite understanding. The authors use relevant philosophical distinctions to classify existing measurement items into a seven-fold structure intended to more comprehensively assess an individual’s sense of meaning. The proposed measure, with three items in each subdomain drawn from previous scales, constitutes what is put forward as the Comprehensive Measure of Meaning to hopefully enrich the empirical research on the assessment of, and on the causes and effects of, having a sense of meaning.
心理学研究人员已经开发了几种测量意义的工具。哲学家们一直在争论生活中意义的客观与主观地位,以及意义的整体与个体或个人方面。在本章中,作者利用心理学文献中关于意义的三方结构的新共识,即认知一致性,情感重要性和动机方向。他们用重要的哲学区别来丰富这种理解,以区分这种三方理解中的子领域。作者使用相关的哲学区别,将现有的测量项目分类为一个七重结构,旨在更全面地评估个人的意义感。本文提出的“意义综合测度”(Comprehensive measure of Meaning)是根据以往的量表,在每个子域中分别包含三个条目,旨在丰富意义感评估及其因果关系的实证研究。