A Review of Common Tools and Techniques for Reconnaissance Attacks.. Proceedings of the

Odun-Ayo Isaac Gabriel
{"title":"A Review of Common Tools and Techniques for Reconnaissance Attacks.. Proceedings of the","authors":"Odun-Ayo Isaac Gabriel","doi":"10.22624/aims/isteams-2021/v28p11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A reconnaissance helps the attacker gain valuable information on the target to help the attacker select the best tools that would make the attack successful. Aim: This study aims to review tools for reconnaissance attacks which will be beneficial to professional ethical hackers and also enlighten organizations and the general public of the potential harm of successful reconnaissance attacks. Methodology: The databases – Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, IEEE, ACM, ArXiv, and Google Scholar were explored. A quantitative evaluation was conducted on 19 selected articles. Result: 95.2% of the reconnaissance tools allowed experts to gather information by use of the command line. While 4.8% of the tools do not provide a commandline interface. 61.9% of the tools are network-based – can be used to gather data about the target’s network infrastructure. Conclusion: The best-fit tool is massively dependent on the attacker or penetration tester. Therefore, a tool should be selected based on the user’s preference and the attack style. Keywords: Reconnaissance, cyber-attack, cybersecurity,social engineering, techniques.","PeriodicalId":332710,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th iSTEAMS Multidisciplinary & Inter-tertiary Research Conference","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th iSTEAMS Multidisciplinary & Inter-tertiary Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22624/aims/isteams-2021/v28p11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A reconnaissance helps the attacker gain valuable information on the target to help the attacker select the best tools that would make the attack successful. Aim: This study aims to review tools for reconnaissance attacks which will be beneficial to professional ethical hackers and also enlighten organizations and the general public of the potential harm of successful reconnaissance attacks. Methodology: The databases – Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, IEEE, ACM, ArXiv, and Google Scholar were explored. A quantitative evaluation was conducted on 19 selected articles. Result: 95.2% of the reconnaissance tools allowed experts to gather information by use of the command line. While 4.8% of the tools do not provide a commandline interface. 61.9% of the tools are network-based – can be used to gather data about the target’s network infrastructure. Conclusion: The best-fit tool is massively dependent on the attacker or penetration tester. Therefore, a tool should be selected based on the user’s preference and the attack style. Keywords: Reconnaissance, cyber-attack, cybersecurity,social engineering, techniques.
侦察攻击常用工具和技术综述法庭程序
背景:侦察可以帮助攻击者获得有关目标的有价值的信息,从而帮助攻击者选择最佳的工具,使攻击成功。目的:本研究旨在回顾侦察攻击的工具,这将有利于职业道德黑客,也启发组织和公众成功的侦察攻击的潜在危害。方法:检索了Springer、Elsevier、Wiley、IEEE、ACM、ArXiv和Google Scholar等数据库。对选取的19篇文章进行定量评价。结果:95.2%的侦察工具允许专家使用命令行收集信息。而4.8%的工具不提供命令行接口。61.9%的工具是基于网络的——可以用来收集目标网络基础设施的数据。结论:最合适的工具在很大程度上取决于攻击者或渗透测试者。因此,应该根据用户的偏好和攻击方式来选择工具。关键词:侦察,网络攻击,网络安全,社会工程,技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信