Diagnostic Quality of Compressed Medical Images: Objective and Subjective Evaluation

S. E. Ghrare, M. Ali, Munira Ismail, K. Jumari
{"title":"Diagnostic Quality of Compressed Medical Images: Objective and Subjective Evaluation","authors":"S. E. Ghrare, M. Ali, Munira Ismail, K. Jumari","doi":"10.1109/AMS.2008.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Without image compression, images data would become much larger and consequently retrieval of images will be slow, thus telemedicine would in many situations be impractical. But it is natural to raise the question of how much an image can be compressed and still preserve sufficient information for a given clinical application. Evaluation of the diagnostic quality of compressed medical image still remains an important issue. In this paper, three different medical image modalities have been compressed and decompressed using DWT for different compression ratios and evaluated using objective and subjective testing. The quality of the reconstructed images has been measured using objective measures such as MSE, MAE, SNR, and PSNR. Ten observers have been involved to carry out the subjective evaluation. Based on the quality of the reconstructed images, the PSNR obtained has been between 35.3 dB to 58.0 dB for CT scan images, 38.6 dB to 55.0 dB for MRI and 34.5 dB to 51 MB for X-ray images. For radiology applications, the compression ratio of 30:1 is acceptable for CT images, and a compression ratio of 40:1 is acceptable for MRI, and compression ratio of 20:1 is acceptable for X-ray images.","PeriodicalId":122964,"journal":{"name":"2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMS.2008.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Without image compression, images data would become much larger and consequently retrieval of images will be slow, thus telemedicine would in many situations be impractical. But it is natural to raise the question of how much an image can be compressed and still preserve sufficient information for a given clinical application. Evaluation of the diagnostic quality of compressed medical image still remains an important issue. In this paper, three different medical image modalities have been compressed and decompressed using DWT for different compression ratios and evaluated using objective and subjective testing. The quality of the reconstructed images has been measured using objective measures such as MSE, MAE, SNR, and PSNR. Ten observers have been involved to carry out the subjective evaluation. Based on the quality of the reconstructed images, the PSNR obtained has been between 35.3 dB to 58.0 dB for CT scan images, 38.6 dB to 55.0 dB for MRI and 34.5 dB to 51 MB for X-ray images. For radiology applications, the compression ratio of 30:1 is acceptable for CT images, and a compression ratio of 40:1 is acceptable for MRI, and compression ratio of 20:1 is acceptable for X-ray images.
压缩医学图像诊断质量:客观与主观评价
如果没有图像压缩,图像数据将变得更大,因此图像检索将变得缓慢,因此在许多情况下远程医疗将是不切实际的。但是,人们自然会提出这样的问题:图像在被压缩多少的同时,还能保留足够的信息,以供临床应用。压缩医学图像的诊断质量评价仍然是一个重要的问题。在本文中,三种不同的医学图像模式已经压缩和解压缩使用DWT不同的压缩比,并使用客观和主观测试进行评估。利用MSE、MAE、SNR和PSNR等客观指标测量重建图像的质量。已派出10名观察员进行主观评价。根据重建图像的质量,CT扫描图像的PSNR在35.3 dB ~ 58.0 dB之间,MRI图像为38.6 dB ~ 55.0 dB, x射线图像为34.5 dB ~ 51mb。对于放射学应用,CT图像可接受的压缩比为30:1,MRI图像可接受的压缩比为40:1,x射线图像可接受的压缩比为20:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信