{"title":"Sistema de números reais: intuição ou rigor?","authors":"J. Magossi","doi":"10.21711/2319023x2019/pmo75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is classic that some ideas present in courses of Calculus go back to Antiquity, since Archimedes, who, among other scientists, also debated the existence of the continuum. This problem was addressed by I. Newton and G.W. Leibniz, who, in the seventeenth century, developed the Calculus. But geometric intuition, as early as the eighteenth century, did not solve problems of “continuity” that presented themselves to mathematicians. B. Bolzano, A. L. Cauchy, K. Weierstrass, and R. Dedekind questioned the foundations and began the era of rigor in mathematics, whose North turns out to be the system of real numbers: a complete ordered body. A diagnosis in current books of Calculus shows us that intuition and rigor merge, whether in definitions or in demonstrations. This may create doubts for the less attentive reader. The objective is to present a scenario in which geometric intuition reveals pedagogical strategies and rigor indicates the need for mathematical precision.","PeriodicalId":274953,"journal":{"name":"Revista Professor de Matemática On line","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Professor de Matemática On line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21711/2319023x2019/pmo75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is classic that some ideas present in courses of Calculus go back to Antiquity, since Archimedes, who, among other scientists, also debated the existence of the continuum. This problem was addressed by I. Newton and G.W. Leibniz, who, in the seventeenth century, developed the Calculus. But geometric intuition, as early as the eighteenth century, did not solve problems of “continuity” that presented themselves to mathematicians. B. Bolzano, A. L. Cauchy, K. Weierstrass, and R. Dedekind questioned the foundations and began the era of rigor in mathematics, whose North turns out to be the system of real numbers: a complete ordered body. A diagnosis in current books of Calculus shows us that intuition and rigor merge, whether in definitions or in demonstrations. This may create doubts for the less attentive reader. The objective is to present a scenario in which geometric intuition reveals pedagogical strategies and rigor indicates the need for mathematical precision.
微积分课程中的一些观点可以追溯到古代,这是很经典的,因为阿基米德和其他科学家一样,也争论过连续体的存在。这个问题是由牛顿和莱布尼茨解决的,他们在17世纪发展了微积分。但是,早在18世纪,几何直觉就没有解决摆在数学家面前的“连续性”问题。B. Bolzano, a . L. Cauchy, K. Weierstrass和R. Dedekind质疑了数学的基础,并开始了数学的严谨时代,其北方原来是实数系统:一个完整的有序体。在当前的微积分书籍诊断告诉我们,直觉和严格合并,无论是在定义或演示。这可能会让不那么细心的读者产生疑虑。目标是呈现一个场景,其中几何直觉揭示了教学策略和严谨性表明需要数学精度。