Real-time classification of multi-modal sensory data for prosthetic hand control

I. Kyranou, Agamemnon Krasoulis, M. S. Erden, K. Nazarpour, S. Vijayakumar
{"title":"Real-time classification of multi-modal sensory data for prosthetic hand control","authors":"I. Kyranou, Agamemnon Krasoulis, M. S. Erden, K. Nazarpour, S. Vijayakumar","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work on myoelectric prosthetic control has shown that the incorporation of accelerometry information along with surface electromyography (sEMG) has the potential of improving the performance and robustness of a prosthetic device by increasing the classification accuracy. In this study, we investigated whether myoelectric control could further benefit from the use of additional sensory modalities such as gyroscopes and magnetometers. We trained a multi-class linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier to discriminate between six hand grip patterns and used predictions to control a robotic prosthetic hand in real-time. We recorded initial training data by using a total number of 12 sEMG sensors, each of which integrated a 9 degree-of-freedom inertial measurement unit (IMU). For classification, four different decoding schemes were used; 1) sEMG and IMU from all sensors 2) sEMG from all sensors, 3) IMU from all sensors and, finally, 4) sEMG and IMU from a nearly optimal subset of sensors. These schemes were evaluated based on offline classification accuracy on the training data, as well as with task-related metrics such as completion rates and times for a pick-and-place real-time experiment. We found that the classifier trained with all the sensory modalities and sensors (condition 1) attained the best decoding performance by achieving a 90.4% completion rate with an average completion time of 41.9 sec in real-time experiments. We also found that classifiers incorporating sEMG and IMU information outperformed on average the ones that only used sEMG signals, even when the amount of sensors used was less than half in the former case. These results suggest that using extra modalities along with sEMG might be more beneficial than including additional sEMG sensors.","PeriodicalId":235222,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Recent work on myoelectric prosthetic control has shown that the incorporation of accelerometry information along with surface electromyography (sEMG) has the potential of improving the performance and robustness of a prosthetic device by increasing the classification accuracy. In this study, we investigated whether myoelectric control could further benefit from the use of additional sensory modalities such as gyroscopes and magnetometers. We trained a multi-class linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier to discriminate between six hand grip patterns and used predictions to control a robotic prosthetic hand in real-time. We recorded initial training data by using a total number of 12 sEMG sensors, each of which integrated a 9 degree-of-freedom inertial measurement unit (IMU). For classification, four different decoding schemes were used; 1) sEMG and IMU from all sensors 2) sEMG from all sensors, 3) IMU from all sensors and, finally, 4) sEMG and IMU from a nearly optimal subset of sensors. These schemes were evaluated based on offline classification accuracy on the training data, as well as with task-related metrics such as completion rates and times for a pick-and-place real-time experiment. We found that the classifier trained with all the sensory modalities and sensors (condition 1) attained the best decoding performance by achieving a 90.4% completion rate with an average completion time of 41.9 sec in real-time experiments. We also found that classifiers incorporating sEMG and IMU information outperformed on average the ones that only used sEMG signals, even when the amount of sensors used was less than half in the former case. These results suggest that using extra modalities along with sEMG might be more beneficial than including additional sEMG sensors.
假手控制多模态传感数据实时分类
最近关于肌电假肢控制的研究表明,结合加速测量信息和表面肌电图(sEMG)有可能通过提高分类精度来改善假肢装置的性能和鲁棒性。在这项研究中,我们调查了肌电控制是否可以进一步受益于使用额外的感觉模式,如陀螺仪和磁力计。我们训练了一个多类线性判别分析(LDA)分类器来区分六种手部握持模式,并使用预测来实时控制机器人假手。我们使用总共12个表面肌电信号传感器记录初始训练数据,每个传感器集成了一个9自由度惯性测量单元(IMU)。在分类方面,采用了四种不同的解码方案;1)所有传感器的表面肌电信号和IMU 2)所有传感器的表面肌电信号,3)所有传感器的IMU,最后,4)几乎最优的传感器子集的表面肌电信号和IMU。这些方案基于训练数据的离线分类准确性,以及任务相关指标(如完成率和实时取放实验的时间)进行评估。我们发现,使用所有感觉模态和传感器(条件1)训练的分类器在实时实验中获得了最好的解码性能,完成率为90.4%,平均完成时间为41.9秒。我们还发现,结合sEMG和IMU信息的分类器平均表现优于仅使用sEMG信号的分类器,即使使用的传感器数量不到前一种情况的一半。这些结果表明,使用额外的模式和表面肌电信号可能比使用额外的表面肌电信号传感器更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信