Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Head Together dan Student Team Achievement Division Pada Siswa MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kecamatan Kampar

Desi Anggraini
{"title":"Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Head Together dan Student Team Achievement Division Pada Siswa MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kecamatan Kampar","authors":"Desi Anggraini","doi":"10.24014/idj.v1i2.6462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is \"Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?\" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric","PeriodicalId":199815,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Development Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Instructional Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/idj.v1i2.6462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric
本文旨在通过在Kampar地区Muhammadiyah Penyasawan MTs的圆圈主题上应用合作学习模式(Number Head Type together, NHT)和学生团队成就划分(Student Team Achievement Division, STAD),通过使用适当的学习模式来确定数学学习结果的差异。在这项研究中,问题陈述是“在穆罕默迪亚Penyasawan Kampar地区八年级学生中,使用合作学习模式(NHT)和学生成就划分(STAD)类型在圆主题上的数学学习结果是否存在差异?”本文采用比较研究的方法,发现合作学习模式(Number Head Together, NHT)与合作学习模式(Student Achievement Division, STAD)的使用存在差异,在本研究中,研究者作为教师在学习过程中发挥了直接作用。本研究中合作学习NHT类型为X1变量,STAD类型为X2变量,学习结果为Y变量。本研究的人口为所有Muhammadiyah MTS学生,使用的样本是VIIIA班作为一个使用合作学习类型数字头一起(NHT)的班级,VIIIB班作为一个使用学生团队成就划分(STAD)类型学习模型的班级。研究对象为八年级八年级学生,研究对象为采用合作学习模式的NHT学习成果和采用STAD学习模式的学习成果。数据收集技术以观察、记录和测试的形式在学习会议结束后的第六次会议上进行。使用test-t公式对该数据进行处理,得到t值为4.115,显著性值为2.69,计算得到的显著性值大于显著性水平α = 0.05,则接受Ha。基于数据分析的结果,我们得出结论,在MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar地区,使用合作学习模式(NHT)和学生成绩划分(STAD)的学生在圆科目上的数学学习结果存在差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信