Evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile application on the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation

Gani Tulepbergenov, D. Ospanova, S. Alimbayeva, A. Puodziukynas, A. Kodasbayev, A. Abenova, A. Almukhanova, S. Tanabayeva, Ildar Fakhradiyev, A. Sadykova
{"title":"Evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile application on the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation","authors":"Gani Tulepbergenov, D. Ospanova, S. Alimbayeva, A. Puodziukynas, A. Kodasbayev, A. Abenova, A. Almukhanova, S. Tanabayeva, Ildar Fakhradiyev, A. Sadykova","doi":"10.5114/fmpcr.2022.118289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A – Study Design, B – Data Collection, C – Statistical Analysis, D – Data Interpretation, E – Manuscript Preparation, F – Literature Search, G – Funds Collection Background. To date, no research on the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within the territory of Kazakhstan and Central Asia has been conducted. Objectives. The study aimed to investigate the effect of a mobile application on adherence in patients diagnosed with AF and treated in outpatient clinics. In addition, the reliability of a structured scale for assessing adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation was also validated. Material and methods. A prospective one-centre study was conducted on 599 patients diagnosed with AF at the City Cardiology Centre (Almaty, Kazakhstan). Patients were sub-divided into control (CG) and intervention (IG) groups. Patients in the IG group used the MyTherapy mobile app. Treatment adherence was assessed using the 14-item Lebanese Drug Adherence Scale (LMAS-14). Data was collected before starting therapy (T1) and 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after the start of treatment. Results. In the T1 period, the adherence of patients in the CG and IG groups was average ( p = 0.547). After 3 months (T2), adherence of participants in the IG group (39.1 ± 1.3) was significantly higher than in the CG group ( p ≤ 0.05). In the T3 period, patients of the IG group had a high adherence equal to 38.3 ± 1.6 ( p ≤ 0.05). After 12 months (T4), the respondents in the IG group retained high adherence rates equal to 38.9 ± 3.2 ( p = 0.001). An estimate of the readmission rate within 12 months shows relatively low rates in the IG group (9.8%). Conclusions. The results of the study showed the effectiveness of using the MyTherapy mobile app for increasing adherence in patients with AF. In addition, the use of the LMAS-14 facilitated and optimised the assessment of the level of adherence in patients with AF.","PeriodicalId":305591,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine & Primary Care Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine & Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2022.118289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A – Study Design, B – Data Collection, C – Statistical Analysis, D – Data Interpretation, E – Manuscript Preparation, F – Literature Search, G – Funds Collection Background. To date, no research on the adherence of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within the territory of Kazakhstan and Central Asia has been conducted. Objectives. The study aimed to investigate the effect of a mobile application on adherence in patients diagnosed with AF and treated in outpatient clinics. In addition, the reliability of a structured scale for assessing adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation was also validated. Material and methods. A prospective one-centre study was conducted on 599 patients diagnosed with AF at the City Cardiology Centre (Almaty, Kazakhstan). Patients were sub-divided into control (CG) and intervention (IG) groups. Patients in the IG group used the MyTherapy mobile app. Treatment adherence was assessed using the 14-item Lebanese Drug Adherence Scale (LMAS-14). Data was collected before starting therapy (T1) and 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after the start of treatment. Results. In the T1 period, the adherence of patients in the CG and IG groups was average ( p = 0.547). After 3 months (T2), adherence of participants in the IG group (39.1 ± 1.3) was significantly higher than in the CG group ( p ≤ 0.05). In the T3 period, patients of the IG group had a high adherence equal to 38.3 ± 1.6 ( p ≤ 0.05). After 12 months (T4), the respondents in the IG group retained high adherence rates equal to 38.9 ± 3.2 ( p = 0.001). An estimate of the readmission rate within 12 months shows relatively low rates in the IG group (9.8%). Conclusions. The results of the study showed the effectiveness of using the MyTherapy mobile app for increasing adherence in patients with AF. In addition, the use of the LMAS-14 facilitated and optimised the assessment of the level of adherence in patients with AF.
评估心房颤动患者依从性的移动应用程序的有效性
A -研究设计,B -数据收集,C -统计分析,D -数据解释,E -稿件准备,F -文献检索,G -资金收集背景。迄今为止,尚未对哈萨克斯坦和中亚境内房颤(AF)患者的依从性进行研究。目标。该研究旨在调查移动应用程序对诊断为房颤并在门诊治疗的患者依从性的影响。此外,用于评估房颤患者依从性的结构化量表的可靠性也得到了验证。材料和方法。一项前瞻性单中心研究在城市心脏病中心(阿拉木图,哈萨克斯坦)对599名诊断为房颤的患者进行了研究。患者再分为对照组(CG)和干预组(IG)。IG组患者使用MyTherapy移动应用程序。使用14项黎巴嫩药物依从性量表(LMAS-14)评估治疗依从性。开始治疗前(T1)和开始治疗后3个月(T2)、6个月(T3)和12个月(T4)收集数据。结果。在T1期,CG组和IG组患者的依从性平均(p = 0.547)。3个月(T2)后,IG组患者的依从性(39.1±1.3)明显高于CG组(p≤0.05)。在T3期,IG组患者的高依从性为38.3±1.6 (p≤0.05)。12个月(T4)后,IG组的应答者仍保持较高的依从率,为38.9±3.2 (p = 0.001)。对12个月内再入院率的估计显示,IG组的再入院率相对较低(9.8%)。结论。研究结果显示,使用MyTherapy移动应用程序提高房颤患者依从性的有效性。此外,LMAS-14的使用促进并优化了房颤患者依从性水平的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信