Differentiating smartphone users by app usage

Pascal Welke, I. Andone, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Alexander Markowetz
{"title":"Differentiating smartphone users by app usage","authors":"Pascal Welke, I. Andone, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Alexander Markowetz","doi":"10.1145/2971648.2971707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tracking users across websites and apps is as desirable to the marketing industry as it is unalluring to users. The central challenge lies in identifying users from the perspective of different apps/sites. While there are methods to identify users via technical settings of their phones, these are prone to countermeasures. Yet, in this paper, we show that it is possible to differentiate users via their set of used apps, their app signature. To this end, we investigate the app usage of 46726 participants from the Menthal project. Even limiting our observation to the 500 globally most frequent apps results in unique signatures for 99.67% of users. Furthermore, even under this restriction, the average minimum Hamming distance to the closest other user is 25.93. Avoiding identification would thus require a massive change in the behavior of a user. Indeed, 99.4% of all users have unique usage patterns among the top 60 globally used apps. In contrast to previous work, this paper differentiates between users based on behavior instead of technical parameters. It thus opens an entirely new discussion regarding privacy.","PeriodicalId":303792,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Tracking users across websites and apps is as desirable to the marketing industry as it is unalluring to users. The central challenge lies in identifying users from the perspective of different apps/sites. While there are methods to identify users via technical settings of their phones, these are prone to countermeasures. Yet, in this paper, we show that it is possible to differentiate users via their set of used apps, their app signature. To this end, we investigate the app usage of 46726 participants from the Menthal project. Even limiting our observation to the 500 globally most frequent apps results in unique signatures for 99.67% of users. Furthermore, even under this restriction, the average minimum Hamming distance to the closest other user is 25.93. Avoiding identification would thus require a massive change in the behavior of a user. Indeed, 99.4% of all users have unique usage patterns among the top 60 globally used apps. In contrast to previous work, this paper differentiates between users based on behavior instead of technical parameters. It thus opens an entirely new discussion regarding privacy.
通过应用使用情况区分智能手机用户
通过网站和应用程序跟踪用户对营销行业来说是可取的,但对用户来说却没有吸引力。核心的挑战在于从不同的应用程序/网站的角度来识别用户。虽然有一些方法可以通过手机的技术设置来识别用户,但这些方法很容易被反制。然而,在本文中,我们表明可以通过他们使用的应用程序集,他们的应用程序签名来区分用户。为此,我们调查了来自mentthal项目的46726名参与者的应用程序使用情况。即使将我们的观察限制在全球最常见的500个应用程序中,也会发现99.67%的用户具有唯一签名。此外,即使在这种限制下,到最近的其他用户的平均最小汉明距离为25.93。因此,避免识别需要用户的行为发生巨大变化。事实上,99.4%的用户在全球使用最多的60款应用中都有自己独特的使用模式。与之前的工作不同,本文基于行为而不是技术参数来区分用户。因此,它开启了一个关于隐私的全新讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信