Plausibility measures and default reasoning: an overview

Joseph Y. Halpern, N. Friedman
{"title":"Plausibility measures and default reasoning: an overview","authors":"Joseph Y. Halpern, N. Friedman","doi":"10.1109/LICS.1999.782603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a new approach to modeling uncertainty based on plausibility measures. This approach is easily seen to generalize other approaches to modeling uncertainty, such as probability measures, belief functions, and possibility measures. We then consider one application of plausibility measures: default reasoning. In recent years, a number of different semantics for defaults have been proposed, such as preferential structures, /spl epsiv/-semantics, possibilistic structures, and /spl kappa/-rankings, that have been shown to be characterized by the same set of axioms, known as the KLM properties. While this was viewed as a surprise, we show here that it is almost inevitable. In the framework of plausibility measures, we can give a necessary condition for the KLM axioms to be sound, and an additional condition necessary and sufficient to ensure that the KLM axioms are complete. This additional condition is so weak that it is almost always met whenever the axioms are sound. In particular, it is easily seen to hold for all the proposals made in the literature. Finally, we show that plausibility measures provide an appropriate basis for examining first-order default logics.","PeriodicalId":352531,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1999.782603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We introduce a new approach to modeling uncertainty based on plausibility measures. This approach is easily seen to generalize other approaches to modeling uncertainty, such as probability measures, belief functions, and possibility measures. We then consider one application of plausibility measures: default reasoning. In recent years, a number of different semantics for defaults have been proposed, such as preferential structures, /spl epsiv/-semantics, possibilistic structures, and /spl kappa/-rankings, that have been shown to be characterized by the same set of axioms, known as the KLM properties. While this was viewed as a surprise, we show here that it is almost inevitable. In the framework of plausibility measures, we can give a necessary condition for the KLM axioms to be sound, and an additional condition necessary and sufficient to ensure that the KLM axioms are complete. This additional condition is so weak that it is almost always met whenever the axioms are sound. In particular, it is easily seen to hold for all the proposals made in the literature. Finally, we show that plausibility measures provide an appropriate basis for examining first-order default logics.
合理性措施和默认推理:概述
提出了一种基于可信性度量的不确定性建模新方法。这种方法很容易被看作是对不确定性建模的其他方法的推广,例如概率度量、信念函数和可能性度量。然后我们考虑可信性度量的一个应用:默认推理。近年来,已经提出了许多不同的默认语义,例如优先结构、/spl epsiv/-语义、可能性结构和/spl kappa/-排名,这些已被证明具有相同的公理集,称为KLM性质。虽然这被视为一个意外,但我们在这里表明,这几乎是不可避免的。在似然测度的框架中,我们可以给出KLM公理健全的必要条件,以及保证KLM公理完备的充分必要条件。这个附加条件是如此弱,以至于只要公理是健全的,它几乎总是被满足的。特别是,很容易看出它支持文献中提出的所有建议。最后,我们证明了可信性度量为检查一阶默认逻辑提供了适当的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信