EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SELECTED COURSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING IN STUDENTS

M. O. Kabysheva
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SELECTED COURSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING IN STUDENTS","authors":"M. O. Kabysheva","doi":"10.52512/2306-5079-2022-90-2-68-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of critical and reflexive thinking is necessary not only for the learning process, in the labor market employers also appreciate specialists who are able to make reasoned decisions, adapt, think and analyze their own and the actions of others. Many methods declare the development of critical thinking in students of higher educational institutions, but, unfortunately, do not measure the actual progress using verified methods for assessing the level of critical thinking. The article offers the results of a study of the effectiveness of the allocated course, aimed at the development of critical thinking among future chemistry teachers. A dedicated course of special seminars aimed at developing critical thinking conducted entirely in an online format in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered as an online course using limited methods, but no less effective. The effectiveness of the special seminar course tested by adapting selected questions from the Watson-Glazer questionnaire before and after the course for the control and experimental groups. Then, by comparing the relative values, it was found that for the main five targets (evaluation of approval, interpretation, recognition of assumptions, deduction and the ability to draw conclusions), the experimental group showed an increase compared to the control group. It is prove that the students with whom the course passed, in absolute terms, showed an improvement in all measured parameters by 34% compared with the control group.","PeriodicalId":162040,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52512/2306-5079-2022-90-2-68-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of critical and reflexive thinking is necessary not only for the learning process, in the labor market employers also appreciate specialists who are able to make reasoned decisions, adapt, think and analyze their own and the actions of others. Many methods declare the development of critical thinking in students of higher educational institutions, but, unfortunately, do not measure the actual progress using verified methods for assessing the level of critical thinking. The article offers the results of a study of the effectiveness of the allocated course, aimed at the development of critical thinking among future chemistry teachers. A dedicated course of special seminars aimed at developing critical thinking conducted entirely in an online format in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered as an online course using limited methods, but no less effective. The effectiveness of the special seminar course tested by adapting selected questions from the Watson-Glazer questionnaire before and after the course for the control and experimental groups. Then, by comparing the relative values, it was found that for the main five targets (evaluation of approval, interpretation, recognition of assumptions, deduction and the ability to draw conclusions), the experimental group showed an increase compared to the control group. It is prove that the students with whom the course passed, in absolute terms, showed an improvement in all measured parameters by 34% compared with the control group.
评价所选课程对培养学生批判性思维的效果
批判性和反思性思维的能力不仅对学习过程是必要的,在劳动力市场上,雇主也欣赏那些能够做出合理决定、适应、思考和分析自己和他人行为的专家。许多方法宣称高等教育机构学生批判性思维的发展,但不幸的是,并没有使用评估批判性思维水平的验证方法来衡量实际进展。本文提供了一项针对未来化学教师批判性思维发展的课程分配有效性的研究结果。在2019冠状病毒病大流行的头几个月,旨在培养批判性思维的专门特别研讨会课程完全以在线形式进行,并被视为使用有限方法的在线课程,但效果并不差。通过在课前和课后对对照组和实验组采用沃森-格雷泽问卷的选择问题来测试专题研讨会课程的有效性。然后,通过对比相对值发现,在主要的5个指标(对批准的评价、解释、对假设的认识、推断和得出结论的能力)上,实验组比对照组有所提高。事实证明,与对照组相比,通过课程的学生在所有测量参数上的绝对改善幅度为34%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信