Media, digital sovereignty and geopolitics: the case of the TikTok ban in India

Ajay Kumar, D. Thussu
{"title":"Media, digital sovereignty and geopolitics: the case of the TikTok ban in India","authors":"Ajay Kumar, D. Thussu","doi":"10.1177/01634437231174351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TikTok, one of the most downloaded apps in the world, has been banned in India since June 2020, following military clashes on the India-China border. This article focuses on government narratives of the TikTok ban in the Indian media and situates the issue within the broader geopolitical framework of deteriorating Sino-Indian relations and attempts for digital sovereignty. At a time of strong nationalist discourses dominating the political and social communication in India, it is perhaps unsurprising that the narratives have been seen outside India as protectionism. However, this paper argues that the digital sovereignty in the Indian context is not exclusionary but aims to create a robust digital infrastructure that is critical for economic development and self-reliance. Highlighting the lessons from India, this paper concludes the following: (i) digital sovereignty is a form of discourse which does not imply any specific policy, (ii) digital sovereignty relates to user control over their data, however, the role and limits of the State is not clearly defined and (iii) digital platforms are highly vulnerable to changing geopolitics in which their existence is not determined by user-platform interactions but by international relations.","PeriodicalId":427430,"journal":{"name":"Media, Culture & Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231174351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

TikTok, one of the most downloaded apps in the world, has been banned in India since June 2020, following military clashes on the India-China border. This article focuses on government narratives of the TikTok ban in the Indian media and situates the issue within the broader geopolitical framework of deteriorating Sino-Indian relations and attempts for digital sovereignty. At a time of strong nationalist discourses dominating the political and social communication in India, it is perhaps unsurprising that the narratives have been seen outside India as protectionism. However, this paper argues that the digital sovereignty in the Indian context is not exclusionary but aims to create a robust digital infrastructure that is critical for economic development and self-reliance. Highlighting the lessons from India, this paper concludes the following: (i) digital sovereignty is a form of discourse which does not imply any specific policy, (ii) digital sovereignty relates to user control over their data, however, the role and limits of the State is not clearly defined and (iii) digital platforms are highly vulnerable to changing geopolitics in which their existence is not determined by user-platform interactions but by international relations.
媒体、数字主权和地缘政治:TikTok在印度被禁的案例
抖音是世界上下载量最大的应用程序之一,自2020年6月印中边境发生军事冲突后,抖音在印度被禁止使用。本文侧重于印度媒体对TikTok禁令的政府叙述,并将该问题置于中印关系恶化和数字主权企图的更广泛的地缘政治框架中。在印度强烈的民族主义话语主导着政治和社会交流的时候,这种叙事被印度以外的人视为保护主义或许并不奇怪。然而,本文认为,印度背景下的数字主权不是排他性的,而是旨在创建一个强大的数字基础设施,这对经济发展和自力更生至关重要。本文强调了印度的经验教训,得出以下结论:(i)数字主权是一种话语形式,并不意味着任何具体政策;(ii)数字主权与用户对其数据的控制有关,然而,国家的角色和限制没有明确界定;(iii)数字平台极易受到地缘政治变化的影响,在地缘政治变化中,数字平台的存在不是由用户-平台互动决定的,而是由国际关系决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信