Pulsed Light at Lower Duty Ratios with Lower Frequencies is Less Advantageous than Continuous Light for CO2 Uptake in Cos Lettuce

T. Jishi, K. Fujiwara, Kyohei Nishino, A. Yano
{"title":"Pulsed Light at Lower Duty Ratios with Lower Frequencies is Less Advantageous than Continuous Light for CO2 Uptake in Cos Lettuce","authors":"T. Jishi, K. Fujiwara, Kyohei Nishino, A. Yano","doi":"10.2150/JLVE.IEIJ120000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The CO2 uptake rate (CUR) of the aerial part of cos lettuce (Lactuca sativa) was measured in pulsed and continuous light at an average photosynthetic (wavelength range: 400–700 nm) photon flux density (PPFD) of 100 μmol m-2 s-1 from white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Three duty ratios of 25, 50, and 75%, combined variously with eight frequencies of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 kHz were used for pulsed light irradiation. The CURs were significantly lower at a duty ratio of 50% for frequencies of 0.1–0.8 kHz and at a duty ratio of 25% for all frequencies than those in continuous light although the average PPFD was unchanged. These results indicate that pulsed light at lower duty ratios, combined with lower frequencies, makes CUR of cos lettuce lower than that attained in continuous light. We infer, based on a PPFD-CUR curve obtained with cos lettuce plant used in the experiment, that when greater PPFD is provided, pulsed light at lower duty ratios with lower frequencies is less advantageous than continuous light for photosynthesis.","PeriodicalId":311488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Light & Visual Environment","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Light & Visual Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2150/JLVE.IEIJ120000482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The CO2 uptake rate (CUR) of the aerial part of cos lettuce (Lactuca sativa) was measured in pulsed and continuous light at an average photosynthetic (wavelength range: 400–700 nm) photon flux density (PPFD) of 100 μmol m-2 s-1 from white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Three duty ratios of 25, 50, and 75%, combined variously with eight frequencies of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 kHz were used for pulsed light irradiation. The CURs were significantly lower at a duty ratio of 50% for frequencies of 0.1–0.8 kHz and at a duty ratio of 25% for all frequencies than those in continuous light although the average PPFD was unchanged. These results indicate that pulsed light at lower duty ratios, combined with lower frequencies, makes CUR of cos lettuce lower than that attained in continuous light. We infer, based on a PPFD-CUR curve obtained with cos lettuce plant used in the experiment, that when greater PPFD is provided, pulsed light at lower duty ratios with lower frequencies is less advantageous than continuous light for photosynthesis.
较低占空比和较低频率的脉冲光对Cos莴苣的CO2吸收不如连续光有利
在白光二极管(led)平均光合(波长400 ~ 700 nm)光子通量密度(PPFD)为100 μmol m-2 s-1的脉冲和连续光条件下,测定了长叶莴苣(lacuca sativa)地上部分的CO2吸收速率(CUR)。脉冲光照射采用了25%、50%和75%的占空比,以及0.1、0.2、0.4、0.8、1.6、3.2、6.4和12.8 kHz的不同频率组合。尽管平均PPFD不变,但在0.1-0.8 kHz频率占空比为50%和所有频率占空比为25%时,CURs明显低于连续光。这些结果表明,较低占空比的脉冲光,结合较低的频率,使得cos莴苣的CUR低于连续光。根据实验中使用的cos莴苣植株的PPFD- cur曲线,我们推断,当PPFD较大时,较低占空比和较低频率的脉冲光不如连续光更有利于光合作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信