Anglers, Fishers, and the St. Croix River: Conflict in a Canadian-American Borderland, 1867–1900

Neil S. Forkey
{"title":"Anglers, Fishers, and the St. Croix River: Conflict in a Canadian-American Borderland, 1867–1900","authors":"Neil S. Forkey","doi":"10.2307/3983556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sportsmen figure prominently in American conservation history. But while sportsmen and sporting activities have been centra l to discussions of the evolution of nineteenthcentury conservation law, their impact on rural destinations has not been fully investigated. This article looks at the St. Croix River Valley of New Brunswick and Maine to analyze the internationa l response to a pro blem of resource property rights and inland fishery access. The St. Croix River Valley along the Canadian-American border demonstrates the difficult ies of managing a shared environment. Author James A. Tober analyzed the character of nineteenth -century wildlife management, positing that two gro ups interacted to create the matrix in which wildlife policy was developed: one group was the often urban-based, affluent sportsmen; the other group was the rural, seasonal market-hunters.' Unlike the market-hunters, sportsmen were wellorganized, well-funded, and able to influence the legislative process. Th eir overall spending in local and state economies also translated into influence when wildlife statutes were both drafted and enforced. In the Canadian-American context of the St. Croix River Valley, three governmenta l bodies administered natural resources. Until the late 1860s the indi vidual provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Canada East and West (today Quebec and Ontario) controlled the fisheries within their borders. Although the 1867 entry of these provinces into the Canadian confedera tion brought control of their waters under federal jurisdiction, ow nership of the fish remained with the individual provinces. This meant , for example, that while New Brunswick claimed the fish caught in its waters, the Ottawa government controlled the waters where the fish were caught. This division of responsibility did not apply in the United States, where states govern ed natural resources directly, and federal law influenced decisions only indirectly. The infusion of sporting tourist capital into the St. Croix River Valley beginning in the 1860s created economic opportunities on many levels. Local merchants and hotel proprietors benefited from the increased patronage of visitors. The state and provincial treasuries of Ma ine and New Brunswick also profited by licensing sportsmen. Ho wever, not all valley residents realized an economic gain. Comm ercial fishermen who drew a seasonal income from trade in Atlant ic salmon were gradua lly edged out of operation by an amalgam of vested interests. By the early-twentieth century legislation aimed at conserving fish stocks on the St. Croix and other regional waterways pushed such fishers to the margins of local prosperity.","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Sportsmen figure prominently in American conservation history. But while sportsmen and sporting activities have been centra l to discussions of the evolution of nineteenthcentury conservation law, their impact on rural destinations has not been fully investigated. This article looks at the St. Croix River Valley of New Brunswick and Maine to analyze the internationa l response to a pro blem of resource property rights and inland fishery access. The St. Croix River Valley along the Canadian-American border demonstrates the difficult ies of managing a shared environment. Author James A. Tober analyzed the character of nineteenth -century wildlife management, positing that two gro ups interacted to create the matrix in which wildlife policy was developed: one group was the often urban-based, affluent sportsmen; the other group was the rural, seasonal market-hunters.' Unlike the market-hunters, sportsmen were wellorganized, well-funded, and able to influence the legislative process. Th eir overall spending in local and state economies also translated into influence when wildlife statutes were both drafted and enforced. In the Canadian-American context of the St. Croix River Valley, three governmenta l bodies administered natural resources. Until the late 1860s the indi vidual provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Canada East and West (today Quebec and Ontario) controlled the fisheries within their borders. Although the 1867 entry of these provinces into the Canadian confedera tion brought control of their waters under federal jurisdiction, ow nership of the fish remained with the individual provinces. This meant , for example, that while New Brunswick claimed the fish caught in its waters, the Ottawa government controlled the waters where the fish were caught. This division of responsibility did not apply in the United States, where states govern ed natural resources directly, and federal law influenced decisions only indirectly. The infusion of sporting tourist capital into the St. Croix River Valley beginning in the 1860s created economic opportunities on many levels. Local merchants and hotel proprietors benefited from the increased patronage of visitors. The state and provincial treasuries of Ma ine and New Brunswick also profited by licensing sportsmen. Ho wever, not all valley residents realized an economic gain. Comm ercial fishermen who drew a seasonal income from trade in Atlant ic salmon were gradua lly edged out of operation by an amalgam of vested interests. By the early-twentieth century legislation aimed at conserving fish stocks on the St. Croix and other regional waterways pushed such fishers to the margins of local prosperity.
垂钓者、渔夫和圣克罗伊河:1867-1900年加拿大-美国边境地区的冲突
运动员在美国自然保护史上占有重要地位。但是,尽管运动员和体育活动一直是讨论19世纪自然保护法演变的核心,但他们对农村目的地的影响尚未得到充分调查。本文以新不伦瑞克省和缅因州的圣克罗伊河谷为例,分析国际社会对资源产权和内陆渔业准入问题的反应。加拿大和美国边境的圣克罗伊河谷(St. Croix River Valley)展示了管理共享环境的困难。作者詹姆斯·a·托伯(James A. Tober)分析了19世纪野生动物管理的特点,假设两个群体相互作用,创造了野生动物政策制定的矩阵:一个群体是经常居住在城市的富裕的运动员;另一组是来自农村的季节性市场猎人。”与市场猎人不同,运动员组织良好,资金充足,能够影响立法程序。当野生动物法规起草和执行时,地方和州经济的总体支出也转化为影响力。在加拿大裔美国人居住的圣克罗伊河谷,有三个政府机构管理自然资源。直到19世纪60年代末,新不伦瑞克省、新斯科舍省和加拿大东部和西部(今天的魁北克省和安大略省)的个别省份控制着其境内的渔业。尽管这些省份在1867年加入加拿大联邦后,将其水域的控制权置于联邦管辖之下,但鱼类的所有权仍然属于各个省份。这意味着,例如,当新不伦瑞克省声称在其水域捕获的鱼时,渥太华政府控制着捕获鱼的水域。这种责任划分在美国并不适用,在美国,各州直接管理自然资源,联邦法律仅间接影响决策。从19世纪60年代开始,体育旅游资本涌入圣克罗伊河谷,在许多层面上创造了经济机会。当地商人和酒店业主从游客的增加中获益。缅因州和新不伦瑞克省的州府和省政府也从向运动员发放执照中获利。然而,并不是所有的山谷居民都实现了经济收益。从大西洋鲑鱼贸易中获得季节性收入的商业渔民逐渐被既得利益集团排挤出经营范围。到20世纪初,旨在保护圣克罗伊河和其他地区水道鱼类资源的立法将这些渔民推向了当地繁荣的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信