RELAÇÃO ENTRE MÉTRICAS ESPACIAS DE PAISAGEM E A PROVISÃO DE SERVIÇOS ECOSSISTÊMICOS POR FLORESTAS URBANAS: UM ESTUDO SISTEMÁTICO DE REVISÃO

Alessandra Leite da Silva, A. Nunes, R. Longo, Admilson Írio Ribeiro
{"title":"RELAÇÃO ENTRE MÉTRICAS ESPACIAS DE PAISAGEM E A PROVISÃO DE SERVIÇOS ECOSSISTÊMICOS POR FLORESTAS URBANAS: UM ESTUDO SISTEMÁTICO DE REVISÃO","authors":"Alessandra Leite da Silva, A. Nunes, R. Longo, Admilson Írio Ribeiro","doi":"10.17127/got/2022.23.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecosystem services are a hotly debated topic in recent years; however, talking about the assessment of ecosystem services only makes sense when there are indicators that are demonstrably correlated with this aspect. This is because it becomes possible to diagnose, evaluate and promote public policies that are aligned with the demands, potentials and expectations for a given ecosystem. Given this, and the growing trend in the use of geotechnologies, this study sought to assess the panorama of research that has possibly studied landscape metrics applied to the assessment of the provision of ecosystem services in an integrated manner. To this end, a bibliometric analysis was carried out on the Scopus Platform using the following keywords: 'valuation of ecosystem services' and 'landscape metrics'. It was found that this topic is not yet complacent; and countries like the United Kingdom, China, Germany, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands have led the research. Especially for forest ecosystems, the gaps are still large, which demands research efforts to consolidate the best and provide solid knowledge bases for an effective management of these sensitive and highly specialized areas for humanity.","PeriodicalId":369350,"journal":{"name":"GOT - Journal of Geography and Spatial Planning","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GOT - Journal of Geography and Spatial Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17127/got/2022.23.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem services are a hotly debated topic in recent years; however, talking about the assessment of ecosystem services only makes sense when there are indicators that are demonstrably correlated with this aspect. This is because it becomes possible to diagnose, evaluate and promote public policies that are aligned with the demands, potentials and expectations for a given ecosystem. Given this, and the growing trend in the use of geotechnologies, this study sought to assess the panorama of research that has possibly studied landscape metrics applied to the assessment of the provision of ecosystem services in an integrated manner. To this end, a bibliometric analysis was carried out on the Scopus Platform using the following keywords: 'valuation of ecosystem services' and 'landscape metrics'. It was found that this topic is not yet complacent; and countries like the United Kingdom, China, Germany, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands have led the research. Especially for forest ecosystems, the gaps are still large, which demands research efforts to consolidate the best and provide solid knowledge bases for an effective management of these sensitive and highly specialized areas for humanity.
城市森林景观空间指标与生态系统服务提供的关系:系统综述研究
生态系统服务是近年来一个备受争议的话题;然而,谈论生态系统服务的评估只有在有明显与这方面相关的指标时才有意义。这是因为有可能诊断、评估和促进符合特定生态系统的需求、潜力和期望的公共政策。考虑到这一点,以及使用地质技术的日益增长的趋势,本研究试图评估以综合方式研究应用于生态系统服务提供评估的景观指标的研究全景。为此,在Scopus平台上使用以下关键词进行了文献计量学分析:“生态系统服务价值”和“景观指标”。人们发现,这个话题还不能自满;英国、中国、德国、澳大利亚、西班牙和荷兰等国家领导了这项研究。特别是在森林生态系统方面,差距仍然很大,这需要进行研究工作,巩固最好的成果,为人类有效管理这些敏感和高度专业化的领域提供坚实的知识基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信