Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Monitoring Kinerja Program Studi Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard Studi Kasus: Prodi Di Fakultas Teknik UKDC

Albertus Daru Dewantoro, Nehemia Dwi April Riyanto, Antonius Yan Sheva Christiano, Citra Rahayu Kumaladewi
{"title":"Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Monitoring Kinerja Program Studi Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard Studi Kasus: Prodi Di Fakultas Teknik UKDC","authors":"Albertus Daru Dewantoro, Nehemia Dwi April Riyanto, Antonius Yan Sheva Christiano, Citra Rahayu Kumaladewi","doi":"10.37477/isejou.v1i1.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The activity of implementing the performance evaluation of study programs in tertiary institutions aims to improve internal quality in a sustainable manner. The performance evaluation process requires a gradual process, namely the performance monitoring process. Evaluation and monitoring of study program performance are generally implemented in the implementation of education, research, and community service to improve study program performance. Therefore, the priority of the main performance indicators of study programs in the Faculty of Engineering is determined by referring to the Chancellor's Regulation No. 03/PR/2022, classifies the main performance indicators of the Faculty of Engineering study program based on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard, and designs a work program monitoring spreadsheet to support KPI achievement. The research also aims to identify KPIs in four stages: customer perspective, financial perspective, business process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The University has prioritized the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th performance indicators. Regulation of the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering No. 143/UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 as a reference in setting KPIs, this document has succeeded in formulating 22 main performance indicators and 5 additional performance indicators. Prioritized performance indicators are then made into a spreadsheet-based performance form which is useful in implementing performance monitoring \n  \nKeywords: Performance measurement, balanced scorecard, key performance indicators","PeriodicalId":277825,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & System Engineering Journals (ISEJOU)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & System Engineering Journals (ISEJOU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37477/isejou.v1i1.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The activity of implementing the performance evaluation of study programs in tertiary institutions aims to improve internal quality in a sustainable manner. The performance evaluation process requires a gradual process, namely the performance monitoring process. Evaluation and monitoring of study program performance are generally implemented in the implementation of education, research, and community service to improve study program performance. Therefore, the priority of the main performance indicators of study programs in the Faculty of Engineering is determined by referring to the Chancellor's Regulation No. 03/PR/2022, classifies the main performance indicators of the Faculty of Engineering study program based on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard, and designs a work program monitoring spreadsheet to support KPI achievement. The research also aims to identify KPIs in four stages: customer perspective, financial perspective, business process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The University has prioritized the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th performance indicators. Regulation of the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering No. 143/UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 as a reference in setting KPIs, this document has succeeded in formulating 22 main performance indicators and 5 additional performance indicators. Prioritized performance indicators are then made into a spreadsheet-based performance form which is useful in implementing performance monitoring   Keywords: Performance measurement, balanced scorecard, key performance indicators
设计支持系统监测工作成绩分析方法:UKDC工程系产品Prodi
高等教育院校实施学习项目绩效评估的目的是以可持续的方式提高内部质量。绩效评估过程需要一个渐进的过程,即绩效监控过程。学习计划绩效的评估和监测通常在教育、研究和社区服务的实施中实施,以提高学习计划的绩效。因此,参考校长第03/PR/2022号条例确定工程学院学习项目主要绩效指标的优先级,根据平衡计分卡的维度对工程学院学习项目的主要绩效指标进行分类,并设计工作计划监控电子表格以支持KPI的实现。该研究还旨在确定四个阶段的kpi:客户视角、财务视角、业务流程视角、学习和成长视角。大学优先考虑第一、第二、第四、第六和第七绩效指标。工程学院院长条例第143/UKDC.1/A号。然后将优先的绩效指标制作成基于电子表格的绩效表格,该表格有助于实施绩效监控。关键词:绩效测量,平衡计分卡,关键绩效指标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信