Corporate Conflict as a Factor in the Positive Development of Socio-economic Relations

O. Osipenko
{"title":"Corporate Conflict as a Factor in the Positive Development of Socio-economic Relations","authors":"O. Osipenko","doi":"10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-49-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is based on the current practice of researching Russian economic, corporate management and judicial application jurisprudence and reveals the paradox of a positive study of corporate conflict on business development, its social resource and its intra-company regulatory base. The author shows that replicated practices of managing groups of corporate conflicts, highlighting obvious regulatory contradictions or alogisms corresponding to the algorithms, signaling the situation of the rule-making process and the expert community of the need to adjust the relevant rules; corporate conflicts in diversified holdings inevitably lead to random outcomes; a non-destructive option for resolving a corporate conflict allows you to increase the group from “smoldering manifestations” of character strengthening, which are corporate contradictions of co-owners or participants and top managers brought to a high degree of aggravation; shareholder antagonisms demonstrate a pronounced institutional energy and an applied demonstration of the usefulness of peacefulness and compromise in conducting polemics defending their mismatched, including diametrically opposed interests of the co-owners of the company; identified cases of occurrence of cases of cardiovascular disorders, initiated by a weak corporate-legal relationship for the management of a group or set of companies, resulting in their defeat, leading to the identification of positive adjustments in corporate behavior for the control of the party; counteracting corporate conflict among children contributes to the development of methodological and applied foundations for company risk management. An internal corporate conflict in the public mind is a spontaneous, but at the same time objectively justified method of protest, which does not cause chances of victory as such, but conditionally works as a stimulus for the creation of civil-democratic foundations of society.","PeriodicalId":269031,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Competition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Competition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-49-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is based on the current practice of researching Russian economic, corporate management and judicial application jurisprudence and reveals the paradox of a positive study of corporate conflict on business development, its social resource and its intra-company regulatory base. The author shows that replicated practices of managing groups of corporate conflicts, highlighting obvious regulatory contradictions or alogisms corresponding to the algorithms, signaling the situation of the rule-making process and the expert community of the need to adjust the relevant rules; corporate conflicts in diversified holdings inevitably lead to random outcomes; a non-destructive option for resolving a corporate conflict allows you to increase the group from “smoldering manifestations” of character strengthening, which are corporate contradictions of co-owners or participants and top managers brought to a high degree of aggravation; shareholder antagonisms demonstrate a pronounced institutional energy and an applied demonstration of the usefulness of peacefulness and compromise in conducting polemics defending their mismatched, including diametrically opposed interests of the co-owners of the company; identified cases of occurrence of cases of cardiovascular disorders, initiated by a weak corporate-legal relationship for the management of a group or set of companies, resulting in their defeat, leading to the identification of positive adjustments in corporate behavior for the control of the party; counteracting corporate conflict among children contributes to the development of methodological and applied foundations for company risk management. An internal corporate conflict in the public mind is a spontaneous, but at the same time objectively justified method of protest, which does not cause chances of victory as such, but conditionally works as a stimulus for the creation of civil-democratic foundations of society.
企业冲突是社会经济关系积极发展的一个因素
本文以俄罗斯经济、公司管理和司法适用法理学研究的现状为基础,揭示了企业冲突在企业发展、社会资源和公司内部监管基础上的实证研究悖论。作者表明,企业冲突管理群体的复制实践,突出了与算法相对应的明显的监管矛盾或逻辑,表明了规则制定过程和专家群体需要调整相关规则的情况;多元化持股下的公司冲突必然导致随机结果;解决公司冲突的非破坏性选项允许你将团队从性格强化的“闷烧表现”中提升出来,即共同所有者或参与者与高层管理人员之间的公司矛盾变得高度恶化;股东对抗表现出一种明显的制度能量,同时也体现了和平与妥协在为他们不匹配的利益(包括公司共同所有者截然相反的利益)辩护时的有用性;认定发生心血管疾病的案件,由薄弱的法人法律关系为集团或公司的管理层发起,导致其失败,导致认定公司行为正向调整,为控制一方;消除儿童之间的公司冲突有助于建立公司风险管理的方法和应用基础。公众心中的企业内部冲突是一种自发的,但同时也是客观合理的抗议方式,这种抗议方式本身不会带来胜利的机会,但有条件地促进了社会公民民主基础的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信