The Death of a Defense: How Derivatives Spell the End of the Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfer Actions in Business Bankruptcies

C. Hall
{"title":"The Death of a Defense: How Derivatives Spell the End of the Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfer Actions in Business Bankruptcies","authors":"C. Hall","doi":"10.15779/Z38ZG52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the \"good faith defense\" to fraudulent transfer actions in bankruptcy. It argues that investors who have hedged their equity interest in an investment will always qualify as good faith transferees, and thus will be effectively immune from the Bankruptcy Code's fraudulent transfer provisions. It then argues that permitting such arbitrary application of the provisions will increase the cost of capital for solvent firms, a result the Bankruptcy Code is designed to avoid. It concludes that one workable solution to this problem is to eliminate the good faith defense altogether in the context of business bankruptcies. The Death of a Defense","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZG52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the "good faith defense" to fraudulent transfer actions in bankruptcy. It argues that investors who have hedged their equity interest in an investment will always qualify as good faith transferees, and thus will be effectively immune from the Bankruptcy Code's fraudulent transfer provisions. It then argues that permitting such arbitrary application of the provisions will increase the cost of capital for solvent firms, a result the Bankruptcy Code is designed to avoid. It concludes that one workable solution to this problem is to eliminate the good faith defense altogether in the context of business bankruptcies. The Death of a Defense
辩护之死:衍生品如何终结对企业破产中欺诈性转让行为的善意辩护
本文探讨了破产欺诈转让诉讼中的“善意抗辩”问题。它认为,对冲了投资股权的投资者将始终符合善意受让人的资格,因此将有效地免于破产法的欺诈性转让条款。然后,它辩称,允许这些条款的任意适用将增加有偿债能力的公司的资本成本,这是《破产法》旨在避免的结果。它的结论是,解决这个问题的一个可行的办法是在企业破产的背景下完全取消诚信辩护。辩护人的死亡
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信