Between Coronavirus and COVID-19: Influence of Nigerian Newspapers’ Headline Construction on Audience Information-Seeking Behaviour

Babatunde Raphael Ojebuyi, Mutiu Iyanda Lasisi, U. Ajetunmobi
{"title":"Between Coronavirus and COVID-19: Influence of Nigerian Newspapers’ Headline Construction on Audience Information-Seeking Behaviour","authors":"Babatunde Raphael Ojebuyi, Mutiu Iyanda Lasisi, U. Ajetunmobi","doi":"10.17932/CTC.2021/CTC21.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the onset of the new coronavirus, the mass media, across the globe, have continued to draw special attention to the disease by adopting different pragmatic and rhetoric strategies. In Nigeria for instance, the news media have continued to draw people’s attention to the virus by using COVID-19 and coronavirus as synonymous lexical entities in the headlines of their news stories. These lexical choices are believed to have some influence on how the audience understand and seek information about the virus. However, existing studies in media and health communication have not copiously explored the relationship between the lexical choices by media to report the COVID-19 pandemic and people’s information-seeking behaviour about the virus. This study was, therefore, designed to investigate how Nigerian journalists used coronavirus and COVID-19 as the key terms to report the virus and how the pragma-semantic implicatures of the lexical choices influenced audience information-seeking behaviours. Pragmatic Acts and Information-Seeking theories were employed as the theoretical framework while online survey and content analysis were adopted as methods. Findings show that although Nigerian journalists used coronavirus (SD=2.090) more often than COVID-19 (SD=1.924) in the headlines, the audience employed COVID-19 (M=2.23, SD=.810) more than coronavirus (M=1.88, SD=.783) while searching information about the virus. Besides, journalists’ use of COVID-19 in the headlines to educate (Chi-square =37.615, df=11, P<.000), warn (Chi-square =26.153, df=11, P<.006), assess (Chi-square= 24.350, df=11, P<.011) and sensitise (Chi-square =24.262, df=11, P<.012) facilitated audience interest in seeking information about the virus than when coronavirus is used as a keyword in the headlines. The lexical choices made by journalists to report a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic have implications for citizens’ knowledge about the crisis.","PeriodicalId":213715,"journal":{"name":"CTC 2021 PROCEEDINGS BOOK","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CTC 2021 PROCEEDINGS BOOK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17932/CTC.2021/CTC21.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the onset of the new coronavirus, the mass media, across the globe, have continued to draw special attention to the disease by adopting different pragmatic and rhetoric strategies. In Nigeria for instance, the news media have continued to draw people’s attention to the virus by using COVID-19 and coronavirus as synonymous lexical entities in the headlines of their news stories. These lexical choices are believed to have some influence on how the audience understand and seek information about the virus. However, existing studies in media and health communication have not copiously explored the relationship between the lexical choices by media to report the COVID-19 pandemic and people’s information-seeking behaviour about the virus. This study was, therefore, designed to investigate how Nigerian journalists used coronavirus and COVID-19 as the key terms to report the virus and how the pragma-semantic implicatures of the lexical choices influenced audience information-seeking behaviours. Pragmatic Acts and Information-Seeking theories were employed as the theoretical framework while online survey and content analysis were adopted as methods. Findings show that although Nigerian journalists used coronavirus (SD=2.090) more often than COVID-19 (SD=1.924) in the headlines, the audience employed COVID-19 (M=2.23, SD=.810) more than coronavirus (M=1.88, SD=.783) while searching information about the virus. Besides, journalists’ use of COVID-19 in the headlines to educate (Chi-square =37.615, df=11, P<.000), warn (Chi-square =26.153, df=11, P<.006), assess (Chi-square= 24.350, df=11, P<.011) and sensitise (Chi-square =24.262, df=11, P<.012) facilitated audience interest in seeking information about the virus than when coronavirus is used as a keyword in the headlines. The lexical choices made by journalists to report a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic have implications for citizens’ knowledge about the crisis.
在冠状病毒与COVID-19之间:尼日利亚报纸标题结构对受众信息寻求行为的影响
自新型冠状病毒爆发以来,全球大众媒体继续采取不同的务实和修辞策略,特别关注这一疾病。例如,在尼日利亚,新闻媒体通过在新闻报道的标题中使用COVID-19和冠状病毒作为同义词的词汇实体,继续吸引人们对该病毒的关注。这些词汇的选择被认为对听众如何理解和寻求有关病毒的信息有一定的影响。然而,现有的媒体与健康传播研究并没有丰富地探讨媒体报道COVID-19大流行的词汇选择与人们对病毒的信息寻求行为之间的关系。因此,本研究旨在调查尼日利亚记者如何使用冠状病毒和COVID-19作为报道病毒的关键术语,以及词汇选择的语用语义含义如何影响受众的信息寻求行为。以语用行为理论和信息寻求理论为理论框架,采用在线调查和内容分析作为研究方法。结果显示,尼日利亚记者在标题中使用冠状病毒(SD=2.090)的频率高于COVID-19 (SD=1.924),但在搜索冠状病毒信息时,受众使用COVID-19 (M=2.23, SD= 0.810)的频率高于冠状病毒(M=1.88, SD= 0.783)。此外,新闻记者在标题中使用COVID-19进行教育(Chi-square= 37.615, df=11, P<.000)、警告(Chi-square= 26.153, df=11, P<.006)、评估(Chi-square= 24.350, df=11, P<.011)和敏感(Chi-square= 24.262, df=11, P<.012),比在标题中使用冠状病毒作为关键词更能提高受众寻求病毒信息的兴趣。记者在报道COVID-19大流行等健康危机时所选择的词汇会影响公民对危机的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信