Comparative study of control methods for steam condenser

N. Shaukat, Bilal Khan, S. M. Ali, Usman Munawar, Zahid Ullah
{"title":"Comparative study of control methods for steam condenser","authors":"N. Shaukat, Bilal Khan, S. M. Ali, Usman Munawar, Zahid Ullah","doi":"10.1109/ECE.2017.8248825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The documented study in this paper is the comparison between Model Predictive Control (MPC) and fine-tuned conventional proportional Integral (PI) controllers. The algorithms used for fine tuning of PI controllers are Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Z-N (Ziegler Nichols), and Grey Wolf Optimization. The MATLAB/Simulink environment is used for comparison of results. The MPC based steam condenser presented excellent and superior dynamic performance in response to different step changes. Also, the detailed tabular comparison of various control metrics showed the better performance of MPC. The overall simulation results demonstrated that MPC can be an efficient alternative to PI controller for the steam condenser.","PeriodicalId":330104,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Energy Conservation and Efficiency (ICECE)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Energy Conservation and Efficiency (ICECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECE.2017.8248825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The documented study in this paper is the comparison between Model Predictive Control (MPC) and fine-tuned conventional proportional Integral (PI) controllers. The algorithms used for fine tuning of PI controllers are Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Z-N (Ziegler Nichols), and Grey Wolf Optimization. The MATLAB/Simulink environment is used for comparison of results. The MPC based steam condenser presented excellent and superior dynamic performance in response to different step changes. Also, the detailed tabular comparison of various control metrics showed the better performance of MPC. The overall simulation results demonstrated that MPC can be an efficient alternative to PI controller for the steam condenser.
蒸汽冷凝器控制方法的比较研究
本文研究的是模型预测控制(MPC)和微调传统比例积分(PI)控制器之间的比较。用于PI控制器微调的算法有粒子群算法、遗传算法、Z-N (Ziegler Nichols)算法和灰狼算法。使用MATLAB/Simulink环境对结果进行比较。基于MPC的蒸汽凝汽器在不同阶跃变化下表现出优异的动态性能。此外,各种控制指标的详细表格比较表明MPC具有更好的性能。整体仿真结果表明,MPC可以作为PI控制器的有效替代方案用于蒸汽冷凝器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信