Embracing the ineffable: landscape art, gesture and environmental ethics.

K. J. Stockfeld
{"title":"Embracing the ineffable: landscape art, gesture and environmental ethics.","authors":"K. J. Stockfeld","doi":"10.60162/swamphen.3.10608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I explore the interrelationships between environmental ethics and landscape art. An environmental ethic has long proven to be elusive, and I make the case that this is because it has been mistakenly viewed as an addendum to our established ethical systems, wherein some particular notion of value will serve as its basis. Affirming Taylor’s insight that our deeper values are those we find most difficult to articulate, I make the case that this inarticulacy is something we ought to embrace. Seeking to identify or specify environmental values is counterproductive, and if we are to succeed in arriving at an environmental ethic, then we must chart a very different course. The starting point is to return to fundamental questions, indeed to the most fundamental of them all, the Question of Being as Heidegger formulated it. Gesturing turns out to be the key to a middle-voiced engagement with the natural world that brings this question to life. Landscape art, whether verbal or visual, has an indispensible role to play in this endeavour: being the leading edge in our gradual maturing towards an ecological ethic, it has its basis in an engagement with our deeper, more inchoate values, and environmental philosophy finds its rightful place by following in its wake.","PeriodicalId":197436,"journal":{"name":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swamphen: a Journal of Cultural Ecology (ASLEC-ANZ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60162/swamphen.3.10608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I explore the interrelationships between environmental ethics and landscape art. An environmental ethic has long proven to be elusive, and I make the case that this is because it has been mistakenly viewed as an addendum to our established ethical systems, wherein some particular notion of value will serve as its basis. Affirming Taylor’s insight that our deeper values are those we find most difficult to articulate, I make the case that this inarticulacy is something we ought to embrace. Seeking to identify or specify environmental values is counterproductive, and if we are to succeed in arriving at an environmental ethic, then we must chart a very different course. The starting point is to return to fundamental questions, indeed to the most fundamental of them all, the Question of Being as Heidegger formulated it. Gesturing turns out to be the key to a middle-voiced engagement with the natural world that brings this question to life. Landscape art, whether verbal or visual, has an indispensible role to play in this endeavour: being the leading edge in our gradual maturing towards an ecological ethic, it has its basis in an engagement with our deeper, more inchoate values, and environmental philosophy finds its rightful place by following in its wake.
拥抱不可言喻:景观艺术,姿态和环境伦理。
我探索环境伦理和景观艺术之间的相互关系。长期以来,环境伦理一直被证明是难以捉摸的,我认为这是因为它被错误地视为我们已建立的道德体系的附录,其中一些特定的价值观念将作为其基础。肯定泰勒的见解,我们的深层价值是那些我们发现最难表达的,我认为这种不清晰是我们应该接受的。试图确定或指定环境价值是适得其反的,如果我们要成功地达到一种环境伦理,那么我们必须制定一个非常不同的路线。起点是回到基本问题,实际上是所有问题中最基本的问题,海德格尔所表述的存在问题。事实证明,手势是与自然世界进行中间声音接触的关键,这将这个问题带入了生活。景观艺术,无论是口头的还是视觉的,都在这一努力中扮演着不可或缺的角色:作为我们逐渐走向成熟的生态伦理的前沿,它的基础是与我们更深层次的、更早期的价值观的接触,环境哲学通过跟随它的脚步找到了它应有的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信