Completing Mahler’s Piano Quartet: A Study of Unfinished Music, Ethics, and Authenticities

Isabella Spinelli
{"title":"Completing Mahler’s Piano Quartet: A Study of Unfinished Music, Ethics, and Authenticities","authors":"Isabella Spinelli","doi":"10.5206/notabene.v14i1.13410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performers and scholars have argued for generations over what should be done with musical works that have been left incomplete by their composers. Though many attempts have been made to bring such works to completion, some scholars feel that these fragments should remain untouched because the pieces in question were left incomplete during the composer’s own career. With this debate in mind, I undertook a study and completion of Gustav Mahler’s Piano Quartet in A minor, a piece for which Mahler composed a complete first movement, Nicht zu schnell, and twenty-four bars of a second movement, Scherzo, when he was a student at the Vienna Conservatory. I began by analyzing Nicht zu schnell in order to understand Mahler’s treatment of motives, form, and harmony. In addition, I studied contemporary works by Schumann and Brahms. Based on my analyses, I then composed a completion of the Scherzo in a style that is, in my opinion, idiomatic of Mahler. After a performance of my completion, seventy percent of the audience responded with five on a scale of zero to six when asked in a survey how closely my Scherzo aligned with Nicht zu schnell. One hundred percent of the listeners ethically approved of the task of completing unfinished music. Adding to the discourse on musical completion, this paper addresses the musicological debate surrounding unfinished music, discusses my process of completing Mahler’s quartet, and assesses public reactions to the ethical issues, such as hubris, that often arise when an alternate composer completes an unfinished work.","PeriodicalId":429335,"journal":{"name":"Nota Bene: Canadian Undergraduate Journal of Musicology","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nota Bene: Canadian Undergraduate Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/notabene.v14i1.13410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performers and scholars have argued for generations over what should be done with musical works that have been left incomplete by their composers. Though many attempts have been made to bring such works to completion, some scholars feel that these fragments should remain untouched because the pieces in question were left incomplete during the composer’s own career. With this debate in mind, I undertook a study and completion of Gustav Mahler’s Piano Quartet in A minor, a piece for which Mahler composed a complete first movement, Nicht zu schnell, and twenty-four bars of a second movement, Scherzo, when he was a student at the Vienna Conservatory. I began by analyzing Nicht zu schnell in order to understand Mahler’s treatment of motives, form, and harmony. In addition, I studied contemporary works by Schumann and Brahms. Based on my analyses, I then composed a completion of the Scherzo in a style that is, in my opinion, idiomatic of Mahler. After a performance of my completion, seventy percent of the audience responded with five on a scale of zero to six when asked in a survey how closely my Scherzo aligned with Nicht zu schnell. One hundred percent of the listeners ethically approved of the task of completing unfinished music. Adding to the discourse on musical completion, this paper addresses the musicological debate surrounding unfinished music, discusses my process of completing Mahler’s quartet, and assesses public reactions to the ethical issues, such as hubris, that often arise when an alternate composer completes an unfinished work.
完成马勒钢琴四重奏:未完成的音乐,伦理和真实性的研究
几代人以来,表演者和学者一直在争论如何处理作曲家留下的未完成的音乐作品。尽管许多人试图完成这些作品,但一些学者认为这些片段应该保持不变,因为这些作品在作曲家自己的职业生涯中是不完整的。带着这样的争论,我开始研究并完成了古斯塔夫·马勒的a小调钢琴四重奏。马勒在维也纳音乐学院读书时,为这部作品创作了完整的第一乐章《夜之夜》和第二乐章《谐调》的24小节。为了理解马勒对动机、形式和和谐的处理,我从分析《夜之祖》开始。此外,我还学习了舒曼和勃拉姆斯的当代作品。根据我的分析,我接着以一种我认为是马勒惯用的风格完成了《调曲》。在我完成一场演出后,当被问及我的《曲》与《夜之祖》的契合程度时,70%的观众给出了5分(从0分到6分)的回答。百分之百的听众在道德上赞同完成未完成音乐的任务。除了关于音乐完成的论述之外,本文还讨论了围绕未完成音乐的音乐学辩论,讨论了我完成马勒四重奏的过程,并评估了公众对道德问题的反应,例如当替代作曲家完成未完成的作品时经常出现的傲慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信