Fact and Myth: Discovering a Racial Problem in Brazil 1

T. Skidmore
{"title":"Fact and Myth: Discovering a Racial Problem in Brazil 1","authors":"T. Skidmore","doi":"10.4324/9780429302640-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines prevalent attitudes towards race in Brazil’s mutiracial society. The author notes that, while there is a considerable literature on slavery and the struggle for abolition, relatively little work has been done on race in Brazil today even though color continues to correlate highly with social stratification. He argues that historically the Brazilian elite has been able to hold to a belief in white superiority and at the same time deny the existence of a racial problem by adopting an “assimilationist” ideology. This begins with the late nineteenthand early twentieth-century thesis that Brazil was progressively “whitening” and continues up to the present day with the widely held view that disproportionate Afro-Brazilian poverty is a legacy of socioeconomic disadvantage and not a result of discrimination. This official ideology has strongly affected the availability of data until recently and has generally been a dominant influence on mainstream academic research on race. The author traces the emergence of criticism of the “myth of racial democracy” from Afro-Brazilian militants and some social scientists, and gives a brief overview of the existing research on contemporary Brazilian race relations. He concludes by outlining a future research agenda for Afro-Brazilian studies.","PeriodicalId":106351,"journal":{"name":"Population, Ethnicity, and Nation-Building","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population, Ethnicity, and Nation-Building","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429302640-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper examines prevalent attitudes towards race in Brazil’s mutiracial society. The author notes that, while there is a considerable literature on slavery and the struggle for abolition, relatively little work has been done on race in Brazil today even though color continues to correlate highly with social stratification. He argues that historically the Brazilian elite has been able to hold to a belief in white superiority and at the same time deny the existence of a racial problem by adopting an “assimilationist” ideology. This begins with the late nineteenthand early twentieth-century thesis that Brazil was progressively “whitening” and continues up to the present day with the widely held view that disproportionate Afro-Brazilian poverty is a legacy of socioeconomic disadvantage and not a result of discrimination. This official ideology has strongly affected the availability of data until recently and has generally been a dominant influence on mainstream academic research on race. The author traces the emergence of criticism of the “myth of racial democracy” from Afro-Brazilian militants and some social scientists, and gives a brief overview of the existing research on contemporary Brazilian race relations. He concludes by outlining a future research agenda for Afro-Brazilian studies.
事实与神话:发现巴西的种族问题
本文考察了巴西多种族社会中对种族的普遍态度。作者指出,虽然关于奴隶制和废除奴隶制的斗争有相当多的文献,但关于今天巴西种族的研究相对较少,尽管肤色仍然与社会分层高度相关。他认为,从历史上看,巴西精英一直能够坚持白人优越的信念,同时通过采用“同化主义”意识形态来否认种族问题的存在。这始于19世纪末和20世纪初的论点,即巴西正在逐渐“白化”,并一直持续到今天,人们普遍认为,巴西黑人不成比例的贫困是社会经济劣势的遗留问题,而不是歧视的结果。直到最近,这种官方意识形态一直强烈地影响着数据的可获得性,并且通常对种族问题的主流学术研究产生了主导影响。作者追溯了巴西黑人激进分子和一些社会科学家对“种族民主神话”的批评的出现,并对当代巴西种族关系的现有研究进行了简要概述。他最后概述了非洲裔巴西人研究的未来研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信