Reading Text Questions in English Class at Tenth Grade of MAS Taman Raya Balingka

Al-Widad Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.58405/aw.v1i1.4
Y. Putri, M. Dewi, Veni Roza, G. Sakti
{"title":"Reading Text Questions in English Class at Tenth Grade of MAS Taman Raya Balingka","authors":"Y. Putri, M. Dewi, Veni Roza, G. Sakti","doi":"10.58405/aw.v1i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was triggered by several problems. First, Some sources book are not presenting HOTS model in several part of the book. Second, students have difficulty understanding questions in textbook. Third, The teacher does not provide teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) while teaching process in order to maximize students higher order thinking skills. This research used quantitative research method. The subject was the questions in the textbook Bahasa Inggris X grade curriculum 2013 revisi 2017 written by Utami Widiati, Zuliati Rahmah, and Furaidah, which published Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud. The researcher used items questions as the observation sheet of document for collecting and analyzing the data to find out the result of the research. This research found that the questions in the textbook did not include create of the cognitive process, based on bloom taxonomy revision. After doing analysis of the data, the researcher finds that the higher order thinking level only obtains 15 out of 74 items questions (20,25%). while the lower order thinking level 60 out of 74 items questions (79,20%). Results from this study show that the percentage of questions for each cognitive level is analyzing C4 (9,45%), evaluating C5 (6,75%), and creating C6(4,05%). This proportion does not meet the ideal proportion that supports the achievement of Basic Analysis Competence, the proportion questions that support are 30% for levels C1 and C2, 40% for levels C3 and C4, and 30% for levels C5 and C6.","PeriodicalId":355050,"journal":{"name":"Al-Widad","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Widad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58405/aw.v1i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research was triggered by several problems. First, Some sources book are not presenting HOTS model in several part of the book. Second, students have difficulty understanding questions in textbook. Third, The teacher does not provide teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) while teaching process in order to maximize students higher order thinking skills. This research used quantitative research method. The subject was the questions in the textbook Bahasa Inggris X grade curriculum 2013 revisi 2017 written by Utami Widiati, Zuliati Rahmah, and Furaidah, which published Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud. The researcher used items questions as the observation sheet of document for collecting and analyzing the data to find out the result of the research. This research found that the questions in the textbook did not include create of the cognitive process, based on bloom taxonomy revision. After doing analysis of the data, the researcher finds that the higher order thinking level only obtains 15 out of 74 items questions (20,25%). while the lower order thinking level 60 out of 74 items questions (79,20%). Results from this study show that the percentage of questions for each cognitive level is analyzing C4 (9,45%), evaluating C5 (6,75%), and creating C6(4,05%). This proportion does not meet the ideal proportion that supports the achievement of Basic Analysis Competence, the proportion questions that support are 30% for levels C1 and C2, 40% for levels C3 and C4, and 30% for levels C5 and C6.
巴林卡小学十年级英语课堂阅读题
这项研究是由几个问题引发的。首先,一些来源的书在书的几个部分没有展示HOTS模型。第二,学生理解课本上的问题有困难。第三,教师在教学过程中没有提供高阶思维技能(HOTS)的教学,以最大化学生的高阶思维技能。本研究采用定量研究方法。主题是由Utami Widiati, Zuliati Rahmah和Furaidah编写的马来语X年级课程2013修订版2017中的问题,该教科书出版了Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud。研究者使用项目问题作为文件的观察表,收集和分析数据,以找出研究结果。本研究发现,基于bloom分类法的修订,教科书中的问题未包含认知过程的创造。在对数据进行分析后,研究者发现高阶思维水平在74个题项中只得到15个题项(20.25%)。而低阶思维水平在74题中有60题(79.20%)。本研究的结果表明,每个认知水平的问题百分比是分析C4(9.45%),评估C5(6.75%)和创造C6(4.05%)。这一比例不符合支持基本分析能力的理想比例,支持C1和C2水平的比例为30%,C3和C4水平为40%,C5和C6水平为30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信