Logic synthesis of binary, carry-save and mixed-radix arithmetic for digital signal processing

S. Bitterlich, H. Meyr
{"title":"Logic synthesis of binary, carry-save and mixed-radix arithmetic for digital signal processing","authors":"S. Bitterlich, H. Meyr","doi":"10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All the commercially available logic-synthesis tools currently use only (non-redundant) binary and two's complement number representations for representing the results of arithmetic operators. We analyze and compare silicon real-estate and throughput of word-parallel arithmetic circuits (add and shift type arithmetic) based on various redundant number representations and compare these results with the automatically optimized two's complement implementations. The literature on redundant number representations typically recommends radix-4 arithmetic for full-custom or a traditional semi-custom design style. We show that the radix-4 implementation is often not optimal for a logic-synthesis based semi-custom design style. Instead, a high-radix or a mixed-radix implementation (which we derive) should be considered.","PeriodicalId":290885,"journal":{"name":"VLSI Signal Processing, IX","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VLSI Signal Processing, IX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSISP.1996.558355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

All the commercially available logic-synthesis tools currently use only (non-redundant) binary and two's complement number representations for representing the results of arithmetic operators. We analyze and compare silicon real-estate and throughput of word-parallel arithmetic circuits (add and shift type arithmetic) based on various redundant number representations and compare these results with the automatically optimized two's complement implementations. The literature on redundant number representations typically recommends radix-4 arithmetic for full-custom or a traditional semi-custom design style. We show that the radix-4 implementation is often not optimal for a logic-synthesis based semi-custom design style. Instead, a high-radix or a mixed-radix implementation (which we derive) should be considered.
用于数字信号处理的二进制逻辑综合、进位保存和混合基数算法
所有商业上可用的逻辑合成工具目前只使用(非冗余的)二进制和二进制补数表示来表示算术运算符的结果。我们分析和比较了基于各种冗余数字表示的字并行算术电路(加法和移位类型算术)的硅空间和吞吐量,并将这些结果与自动优化的两个互补实现进行了比较。关于冗余数表示的文献通常建议在完全定制或传统的半定制设计风格中使用基数-4算法。我们表明,对于基于逻辑合成的半定制设计风格,radix-4实现通常不是最优的。相反,应该考虑高基数或混合基数实现(我们推导的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信