Simple Screening Tests for the Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL) Production in Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter

S. Anwar, R. Miah, A. Saleh, Humayun Sattar, Sharmeen Ahmed
{"title":"Simple Screening Tests for the Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL) Production in Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter","authors":"S. Anwar, R. Miah, A. Saleh, Humayun Sattar, Sharmeen Ahmed","doi":"10.3329/IMCJ.V4I1.5932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are no standard methods for the detection of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) production in gram negative organism in routine microbiology practice. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the screening tests like double disk synergy test (DDST) and disk potentiation test (DPT) using ceftazidime (CAZ) and imipenem (IPM) disks with chelating agents like EDTA, 2-mercaptopropionic acid (2-MPA). A total of 132 Pseudomonas and 76 Acinetobacter isolates were obtained from Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM) hospitals of Dhaka city. A total of 53 and 29 IPM resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter isolates were selected. EDTA-IPM microdilution minimum inhibitory concentration (EDTA-IPM MIC) method detected MBL in 44 (83%) IPM resistant Pseudomonas and 19 (65.5%) Acinetobacter isolates. DDST with CAZ-0.1M EDTA and CAZ-2-MPA detected MBL in 73.6% and 67.9% of IPM resistant Pseudomonas and 55.2% and 48.3% of Acinetobacter isolates respectively. The detection rate was 67.9% and 66.1% in Pseudomonas and 51.7% and 44.8% in Acinetobacter isolates by EDTA-IPM and IPM-2- MPA methods respectively. In comparison to DDST, DPT with CAZ-0.1M EDTA showed higher sensitivity (89.7% ) and specificity (100%) for detection of MBL in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter . The results showed that simple screening tests like DPT with 0.1M EDTA was able to detect MBL producing Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter from clinical samples with high sensitivity and specificity. Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(1): 26-30 DOI: 10.3329/imcj.v4i1.5932","PeriodicalId":226732,"journal":{"name":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V4I1.5932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are no standard methods for the detection of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) production in gram negative organism in routine microbiology practice. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the screening tests like double disk synergy test (DDST) and disk potentiation test (DPT) using ceftazidime (CAZ) and imipenem (IPM) disks with chelating agents like EDTA, 2-mercaptopropionic acid (2-MPA). A total of 132 Pseudomonas and 76 Acinetobacter isolates were obtained from Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM) hospitals of Dhaka city. A total of 53 and 29 IPM resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter isolates were selected. EDTA-IPM microdilution minimum inhibitory concentration (EDTA-IPM MIC) method detected MBL in 44 (83%) IPM resistant Pseudomonas and 19 (65.5%) Acinetobacter isolates. DDST with CAZ-0.1M EDTA and CAZ-2-MPA detected MBL in 73.6% and 67.9% of IPM resistant Pseudomonas and 55.2% and 48.3% of Acinetobacter isolates respectively. The detection rate was 67.9% and 66.1% in Pseudomonas and 51.7% and 44.8% in Acinetobacter isolates by EDTA-IPM and IPM-2- MPA methods respectively. In comparison to DDST, DPT with CAZ-0.1M EDTA showed higher sensitivity (89.7% ) and specificity (100%) for detection of MBL in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter . The results showed that simple screening tests like DPT with 0.1M EDTA was able to detect MBL producing Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter from clinical samples with high sensitivity and specificity. Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(1): 26-30 DOI: 10.3329/imcj.v4i1.5932
假单胞菌和不动杆菌临床分离株金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)产量检测的简单筛选试验
在常规微生物学实践中,革兰氏阴性菌中金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)产量的检测尚无标准方法。本研究评价了头孢他啶(CAZ)和亚胺培南(IPM)圆盘在EDTA、2-巯基丙酸(2-MPA)等螯合剂作用下的双盘协同试验(DDST)和盘增强试验(DPT)的筛选效果。从孟加拉国谢赫穆吉布医科大学(BSMMU)和达卡市糖尿病、内分泌和代谢疾病研究与康复研究所(BIRDEM)医院共分离出132株假单胞菌和76株不动杆菌。共分离出耐药的假单胞菌和不动杆菌53株和29株。EDTA-IPM微量稀释最低抑制浓度(EDTA-IPM MIC)法检出耐药假单胞菌44株(83%)、不动杆菌19株(65.5%)MBL。CAZ-0.1M EDTA和CAZ-2-MPA的DDST对耐药假单胞菌和不动杆菌的MBL检出率分别为73.6%和67.9%,55.2%和48.3%。EDTA-IPM和IPM-2- MPA对假单胞菌的检出率分别为67.9%和66.1%,对不动杆菌的检出率分别为51.7%和44.8%。与DDST相比,CAZ-0.1M EDTA的DPT检测假单胞菌和不动杆菌中MBL的灵敏度(89.7%)和特异性(100%)更高。结果表明,0.1M EDTA的DPT等简单的筛选试验能够从临床样品中检测出产生MBL的假单胞菌和不动杆菌,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。易卜拉欣·迈德,上校。j . 2010;[4] (1): 26-30 DOI: 10.3329/imc .v4i1.5932 .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信