Comparison of spasticity measurements with surface electromyography in the affected and unaffected side of children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy

Tolga Duman, Seyit Çıtaker
{"title":"Comparison of spasticity measurements with surface electromyography in the affected and unaffected side of children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy","authors":"Tolga Duman, Seyit Çıtaker","doi":"10.51271/jorr-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Various methods are used in the evaluation of spasticity, which is common in Cerebral Palsy (CP). However, studies\nmeasuring upper extremity spasticity with Surface Electromyography (sEMG) were found to be insufficient in children with\nCP. In this study, the comparison of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and sEMG measurements for bilateral upper extremity\nspasticity in children with Hemiparetic CP was aimed.\nMethods: 33 (11.03 ± 3.82 years, 11F-2M) patients with hemiparetic CP and 32 healthy controls (10.31± 2.88 years, 16F-16M) with a similar mean age were included in the study.\nResults: Upper extremity spasticities of both sides of the cases were evaluated with MAS and SEMG. Affected side MAS results were found to be higher than the unaffected side (p<0.05). The mean sEMG value of the wrist flexors was lower on the affected side during voluntary contraction and higher during voluntary relaxation (p<0.05). In addition, the maximum percentage of voluntary contraction was measured higher on the affected side (p<0.05).\nConclusion: Spasticity, as assessed by sEMG and MAS, was increased on the affected side. MAS and sEMG give consistent\nresults. These results show us that the YEMG method can be used for spasticity measurements. It is considered that MAS would be a preferable method in evaluating spasticity owing to the fact that it is easy to use and it does not constitute extra costs.","PeriodicalId":313405,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedics Research and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedics Research and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/jorr-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Various methods are used in the evaluation of spasticity, which is common in Cerebral Palsy (CP). However, studies measuring upper extremity spasticity with Surface Electromyography (sEMG) were found to be insufficient in children with CP. In this study, the comparison of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and sEMG measurements for bilateral upper extremity spasticity in children with Hemiparetic CP was aimed. Methods: 33 (11.03 ± 3.82 years, 11F-2M) patients with hemiparetic CP and 32 healthy controls (10.31± 2.88 years, 16F-16M) with a similar mean age were included in the study. Results: Upper extremity spasticities of both sides of the cases were evaluated with MAS and SEMG. Affected side MAS results were found to be higher than the unaffected side (p<0.05). The mean sEMG value of the wrist flexors was lower on the affected side during voluntary contraction and higher during voluntary relaxation (p<0.05). In addition, the maximum percentage of voluntary contraction was measured higher on the affected side (p<0.05). Conclusion: Spasticity, as assessed by sEMG and MAS, was increased on the affected side. MAS and sEMG give consistent results. These results show us that the YEMG method can be used for spasticity measurements. It is considered that MAS would be a preferable method in evaluating spasticity owing to the fact that it is easy to use and it does not constitute extra costs.
偏瘫性脑瘫患儿患侧与未患侧肌电痉挛测量的比较
目的:评估脑瘫(CP)患者痉挛的方法多种多样。然而,研究发现用表面肌电图(sEMG)测量上肢痉挛在cp患儿中是不够的。本研究旨在比较改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和肌电图测量对偏瘫性CP患儿双侧上肢痉挛的影响。方法:选取33例(11.03±3.82岁,11F-2M)偏瘫性CP患者和32例平均年龄相近的健康对照(10.31±2.88岁,16F-16M)。结果:双侧上肢痉挛均采用MAS和SEMG检查。患侧MAS结果高于未患侧(p<0.05)。腕屈肌在自主收缩时肌电信号平均值较低,而在自主放松时肌电信号平均值较高(p<0.05)。此外,患侧自发性收缩的最大百分比较高(p<0.05)。结论:肌电图和肌电图显示患侧痉挛加重。MAS和sEMG给出一致的结果。这些结果表明,yymg方法可以用于痉挛测量。由于它易于使用且不构成额外费用,因此认为MAS将是评估痉挛的较好方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信