Structural pluralism and incivility: comparing patterns of moral foundations and incivility in responses to news posts

Bumsoo Kim
{"title":"Structural pluralism and incivility: comparing patterns of moral foundations and incivility in responses to news posts","authors":"Bumsoo Kim","doi":"10.1108/oir-11-2020-0522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeFocusing on the sociological clarification based on structural pluralism, this study explores the degree to which social media users who comment on the news posts of local newspapers use uncivil remarks and words that reflect their moral foundations.Design/methodology/approachThis computer-assisted data collection produces three types of datasets that include numerous social media comments. To explore the association between moral foundations and incivility, both quadratic association procedure (QAP) and multiple regression QAP (MRQAP) are implemented.FindingsThe findings suggest that social media users who comment on the news posts of urban-located newspapers tend to use more uncivil words compared to social media users who comment on the news posts of suburban and rural-based newspapers. Individuals who comment on the news posts of urban-based newspapers tend to show a wider range of moral foundation spectrums than those who comment on the posts of rural and suburban newspapers. Lastly, there are significant associations between moral-vice components and incivility in response to urban- and suburban-located newspapers' social media posts.Research limitations/implicationsThe employed bag-of-words may not completely capture incivility given that social media users can use nuanced and metaphoric terms instead of explicitly uncivil terms. Even though this study systematically selected local newspapers' social media accounts, the contextual factors of other newspapers in politically slanted communities could be different.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide meaningful and practical implications for journalists and news reporters. The inherent rudeness and aggressiveness of social media users can drive them to use uncivil and moral-harm words against a particular person or group.Social implicationsUnder the circumstance that fake news and politically slanted news content are widely distributed in the United States, social media users may easily express negative emotions toward news stories or the journalists who post the stories.Originality/valueStructural pluralism particularly specializes in explaining why and how the contextual factors of news stories differ depending on community complexity. Building on the reasoning of structural pluralism in the social media context, this study investigates the degree to which social media users who comment on the news posts of local newspapers employ uncivil remarks and moral foundation words.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0522.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2020-0522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeFocusing on the sociological clarification based on structural pluralism, this study explores the degree to which social media users who comment on the news posts of local newspapers use uncivil remarks and words that reflect their moral foundations.Design/methodology/approachThis computer-assisted data collection produces three types of datasets that include numerous social media comments. To explore the association between moral foundations and incivility, both quadratic association procedure (QAP) and multiple regression QAP (MRQAP) are implemented.FindingsThe findings suggest that social media users who comment on the news posts of urban-located newspapers tend to use more uncivil words compared to social media users who comment on the news posts of suburban and rural-based newspapers. Individuals who comment on the news posts of urban-based newspapers tend to show a wider range of moral foundation spectrums than those who comment on the posts of rural and suburban newspapers. Lastly, there are significant associations between moral-vice components and incivility in response to urban- and suburban-located newspapers' social media posts.Research limitations/implicationsThe employed bag-of-words may not completely capture incivility given that social media users can use nuanced and metaphoric terms instead of explicitly uncivil terms. Even though this study systematically selected local newspapers' social media accounts, the contextual factors of other newspapers in politically slanted communities could be different.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide meaningful and practical implications for journalists and news reporters. The inherent rudeness and aggressiveness of social media users can drive them to use uncivil and moral-harm words against a particular person or group.Social implicationsUnder the circumstance that fake news and politically slanted news content are widely distributed in the United States, social media users may easily express negative emotions toward news stories or the journalists who post the stories.Originality/valueStructural pluralism particularly specializes in explaining why and how the contextual factors of news stories differ depending on community complexity. Building on the reasoning of structural pluralism in the social media context, this study investigates the degree to which social media users who comment on the news posts of local newspapers employ uncivil remarks and moral foundation words.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0522.
结构多元化与不文明:道德基础与不文明在回应新闻帖子中的比较模式
本研究着眼于基于结构多元主义的社会学澄清,探讨社交媒体用户在评论地方报纸新闻帖子时使用反映其道德基础的不文明言论和词语的程度。设计/方法/方法这种计算机辅助数据收集产生三种类型的数据集,其中包括大量的社交媒体评论。为了探讨道德基础与不文明行为之间的关系,我们采用二次关联程序(QAP)和多元回归QAP (MRQAP)。研究结果表明,与评论郊区和农村报纸新闻帖子的社交媒体用户相比,评论城市报纸新闻帖子的社交媒体用户倾向于使用更多不文明的词语。评论城市报纸新闻帖子的人往往比评论农村和郊区报纸帖子的人表现出更广泛的道德基础谱。最后,在对城市和郊区报纸社交媒体帖子的回应中,道德恶习成分与不文明行为之间存在显著关联。由于社交媒体用户可以使用微妙和隐喻性的术语,而不是明确的不文明术语,因此所使用的词汇袋可能无法完全捕捉到不文明行为。尽管这项研究系统地选择了当地报纸的社交媒体账户,但政治倾向社区的其他报纸的背景因素可能有所不同。本研究的结果对新闻工作者和新闻记者具有重要的现实意义。社交媒体用户固有的粗鲁和侵略性会驱使他们对特定的人或群体使用不文明和道德伤害的言论。社会影响在假新闻和带有政治倾向的新闻内容在美国广泛传播的情况下,社交媒体用户很容易对新闻报道或发布新闻的记者表达负面情绪。原创性/价值结构多元主义特别擅长解释新闻故事的背景因素为什么以及如何因社区复杂性而不同。基于社交媒体背景下的结构多元主义推理,本研究调查了社交媒体用户在评论地方报纸新闻帖子时使用不文明言论和道德基础词的程度。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0522。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信