{"title":"Characterization of the HEVC Coding Efficiency Advance Using 20 Scenes, ITU-T Rec. P.913 Compliant Subjective Methods, VQM, and PSNR","authors":"Andrew Catellier, M. Pinson","doi":"10.1109/ISM.2015.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new video coding standard, MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or H.265, was developed to be roughly twice as efficient as H.264/AVC -- meaning H.265/HEVC could deliver the same quality as H.264/AVC using roughly half the bitrate. In this paper we describe a subjective experiment designed to test this claim. We present an experiment using 20 different 1080p 29.97 fps scenes and 12 impairment levels spanning MPEG-2, H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC. Additionally we compare the results obtained from the subjective assessment to quality estimates from two objective metrics: VQM and PSNR. Our subjective results show that H.265/HEVC can deliver the same quality at half the bitrate compared to H.264/AVC and can perform better at one quarter the bitrate compared to MPEG-2 in many, but not all, situations. For all 20 scenes coded with H.265/HEVC at 4 Mbps mean opinion scores span 38% of the subjective scale, which indicates the importance of scene selection. Objective quality estimations of HEVC have a low correlation with subjective results (0.60 for VQM, 0.64 for PSNR).","PeriodicalId":250353,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2015.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The new video coding standard, MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or H.265, was developed to be roughly twice as efficient as H.264/AVC -- meaning H.265/HEVC could deliver the same quality as H.264/AVC using roughly half the bitrate. In this paper we describe a subjective experiment designed to test this claim. We present an experiment using 20 different 1080p 29.97 fps scenes and 12 impairment levels spanning MPEG-2, H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC. Additionally we compare the results obtained from the subjective assessment to quality estimates from two objective metrics: VQM and PSNR. Our subjective results show that H.265/HEVC can deliver the same quality at half the bitrate compared to H.264/AVC and can perform better at one quarter the bitrate compared to MPEG-2 in many, but not all, situations. For all 20 scenes coded with H.265/HEVC at 4 Mbps mean opinion scores span 38% of the subjective scale, which indicates the importance of scene selection. Objective quality estimations of HEVC have a low correlation with subjective results (0.60 for VQM, 0.64 for PSNR).
新的视频编码标准MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency video coding (HEVC)或H.265的效率大约是H.264/AVC的两倍,这意味着H.265/HEVC可以以大约一半的比特率提供与H.264/AVC相同的质量。在本文中,我们描述了一个主观实验,旨在验证这一说法。我们提出了一个实验,使用20个不同的1080p 29.97 fps场景和12个MPEG-2, H.264/AVC和H.265/HEVC的损伤级别。此外,我们比较了从主观评估中获得的结果与两个客观指标的质量估计:VQM和PSNR。我们的主观结果表明,H.265/HEVC可以以H.264/AVC一半的比特率提供相同的质量,并且在许多情况下(但不是所有情况)可以以比MPEG-2四分之一的比特率表现得更好。对于所有用H.265/HEVC以4 Mbps编码的20个场景,平均意见得分超过主观尺度的38%,这表明场景选择的重要性。HEVC的客观质量评价与主观结果的相关性较低(VQM为0.60,PSNR为0.64)。