A General Framework to Describe Drilling Process States

E. Cayeux, J. Macpherson, D. Pirovolou, Moray L. Laing, F. Florence
{"title":"A General Framework to Describe Drilling Process States","authors":"E. Cayeux, J. Macpherson, D. Pirovolou, Moray L. Laing, F. Florence","doi":"10.2118/212537-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Automation and digitalization of drilling requires shared knowledge about the state of the drilling process: is the bit on-bottom drilling or is the driller making a connection; is the borehole in good condition or is it sloughing? Yet there is no shared, clear and usable definition of what a drilling process state is, nor an agreed method to calculate it. In this paper, we propose a method to clarify the concept of drilling process state. A set of partial differential equations, respecting boundary conditions, can describe drilling operations. The set of all possible discrete changes of boundary conditions, therefore, defines the set of all possible drilling process states. Equality or inequality of logical expressions of at most two boundary values characterizes a discrete change of a boundary condition. For instance, if forces applied to the bit by the formation are zero, this corresponds to an off-bottom condition, while forces greater than zero means that the bit is on-bottom. Such simple logical conditions are microstates, and an orthogonal set of microstates defines a drilling process state. An analysis of the drilling process from the perspective of these microstates defines an orthogonal basis of microstates. It is possible to define uniquely any drilling process state in this orthogonal basis. There are a finite number of possibilities to move from one state to a different state by changing only one single microstate, which leads to the construction of an implicit graph of possible states. In this implicit state graph, the change from one state to another state that corresponds to more than one modification of the microstates corresponds to a path in the graph. However, the microstate basis depends on the type of drilling process. The paper will provide examples of different microstate bases for conventional drilling, backpressure managed pressure drilling, and dual-gradient managed pressure drilling. Microstates also cover abnormal drilling conditions, such as hanging on a ledge, or flow obstruction in the annulus by a pack-off. They are, therefore, more powerful descriptors than \"rig activity codes\". The required fidelity of the drilling process state depends on its use, for example for controlling drilling equipment (process control), for calculating key performance indicators (process statistics), or for user feedback (human factors engineering). This work is part of the D-WIS initiative (Drilling and Wells Interoperability Standard). D-WIS is a cross-industry workgroup providing the industry with solutions facilitating interoperability of computer systems at the rig site. The definition of a microstate is a simple logical statement, easily implemented in computer software. The paper provides an example of a simple algorithm, which will enable others to leverage the work in the commercial, interoperable, environment.","PeriodicalId":103776,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212537-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automation and digitalization of drilling requires shared knowledge about the state of the drilling process: is the bit on-bottom drilling or is the driller making a connection; is the borehole in good condition or is it sloughing? Yet there is no shared, clear and usable definition of what a drilling process state is, nor an agreed method to calculate it. In this paper, we propose a method to clarify the concept of drilling process state. A set of partial differential equations, respecting boundary conditions, can describe drilling operations. The set of all possible discrete changes of boundary conditions, therefore, defines the set of all possible drilling process states. Equality or inequality of logical expressions of at most two boundary values characterizes a discrete change of a boundary condition. For instance, if forces applied to the bit by the formation are zero, this corresponds to an off-bottom condition, while forces greater than zero means that the bit is on-bottom. Such simple logical conditions are microstates, and an orthogonal set of microstates defines a drilling process state. An analysis of the drilling process from the perspective of these microstates defines an orthogonal basis of microstates. It is possible to define uniquely any drilling process state in this orthogonal basis. There are a finite number of possibilities to move from one state to a different state by changing only one single microstate, which leads to the construction of an implicit graph of possible states. In this implicit state graph, the change from one state to another state that corresponds to more than one modification of the microstates corresponds to a path in the graph. However, the microstate basis depends on the type of drilling process. The paper will provide examples of different microstate bases for conventional drilling, backpressure managed pressure drilling, and dual-gradient managed pressure drilling. Microstates also cover abnormal drilling conditions, such as hanging on a ledge, or flow obstruction in the annulus by a pack-off. They are, therefore, more powerful descriptors than "rig activity codes". The required fidelity of the drilling process state depends on its use, for example for controlling drilling equipment (process control), for calculating key performance indicators (process statistics), or for user feedback (human factors engineering). This work is part of the D-WIS initiative (Drilling and Wells Interoperability Standard). D-WIS is a cross-industry workgroup providing the industry with solutions facilitating interoperability of computer systems at the rig site. The definition of a microstate is a simple logical statement, easily implemented in computer software. The paper provides an example of a simple algorithm, which will enable others to leverage the work in the commercial, interoperable, environment.
描述钻井过程状态的通用框架
钻井的自动化和数字化需要关于钻井过程状态的共享知识:是钻头在底部钻井还是司钻进行连接;井眼状况良好还是在脱落?然而,对于什么是钻井过程状态,目前还没有一个共享的、清晰的、可用的定义,也没有一个公认的计算方法。本文提出了一种澄清钻孔过程状态概念的方法。考虑边界条件的一组偏微分方程可以描述钻井作业。因此,边界条件的所有可能的离散变化的集合定义了所有可能的钻井过程状态的集合。最多两个边值的逻辑表达式的相等或不相等表示边界条件的离散变化。例如,如果地层施加在钻头上的力为零,则对应于井底状态,而大于零的力则意味着钻头在井底。这样简单的逻辑条件就是微状态,一组正交的微状态定义了钻孔过程状态。从这些微观状态的角度分析钻孔过程,定义了微观状态的正交基。在这个正交基础上,可以唯一地定义任何钻孔过程状态。通过仅改变一个微状态,从一个状态移动到另一个状态的可能性是有限的,这导致了可能状态的隐式图的构建。在这个隐式状态图中,从一种状态到另一种状态的变化对应于微观状态的不止一次修改,对应于图中的路径。然而,微观状态的基础取决于钻井过程的类型。本文将提供常规钻井、背压控压钻井和双梯度控压钻井的不同微态基的例子。微观状态还包括异常钻井条件,如悬架,或封隔器在环空造成的流体阻塞。因此,它们是比“钻机活动代码”更强大的描述符。钻井过程状态所需的保真度取决于其用途,例如用于控制钻井设备(过程控制),用于计算关键性能指标(过程统计),或用于用户反馈(人为因素工程)。这项工作是D-WIS计划(钻井和油井互操作性标准)的一部分。D-WIS是一个跨行业工作组,为行业提供解决方案,促进钻井现场计算机系统的互操作性。微状态的定义是一个简单的逻辑陈述,很容易在计算机软件中实现。本文提供了一个简单算法的示例,它将使其他人能够在商业的、可互操作的环境中利用该工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信