Doctrine of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Commercial Contract Particularly Mediation Clauses

S. Islam
{"title":"Doctrine of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Commercial Contract Particularly Mediation Clauses","authors":"S. Islam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3892022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Alternative Dispute Resolution procedure provides an amicable settlement mechanism with the assistance of independent or so-called neutral professionals to resolve conflicts between the contracting parties. Alternative dispute resolution has become increasingly relevant in today’s world, and the number of agreements involving alternative dispute resolution provisions is steadily growing. Alternative dispute resolution is typically more efficient and time-saving than conventional court litigation, which is one of the causes for its development. The current research explores European Union mediation’s most common alternative dispute resolution strategy. It is mainly concerned with the mediation of legal and commercial conflicts. The research discusses European Union alternative dispute resolution patterns and associated requirements under the European Union statute, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation (2002), as well as other laws defined by alternative dispute resolution related organisations such as the International Chamber of Commerce and Effective Dispute Resolution Centre. It also draws parallels between the United States of America and the courts of some Member States of the European Union regarding alternative dispute resolution matters. Furthermore, it finds alternative dispute resolution in the sense of the right to adequate remedies (fundamental principle of the European Union). The study further explores the roots of alternative dispute resolution, its features and applicability, and the benefits of alternative dispute resolution over litigation/arbitration procedures, both of which tend to facilitate alternative dispute resolution’s broader use of business dispute resolution procedures. The qualitative research methodology will be applying for this research.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alternative Dispute Resolution procedure provides an amicable settlement mechanism with the assistance of independent or so-called neutral professionals to resolve conflicts between the contracting parties. Alternative dispute resolution has become increasingly relevant in today’s world, and the number of agreements involving alternative dispute resolution provisions is steadily growing. Alternative dispute resolution is typically more efficient and time-saving than conventional court litigation, which is one of the causes for its development. The current research explores European Union mediation’s most common alternative dispute resolution strategy. It is mainly concerned with the mediation of legal and commercial conflicts. The research discusses European Union alternative dispute resolution patterns and associated requirements under the European Union statute, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation (2002), as well as other laws defined by alternative dispute resolution related organisations such as the International Chamber of Commerce and Effective Dispute Resolution Centre. It also draws parallels between the United States of America and the courts of some Member States of the European Union regarding alternative dispute resolution matters. Furthermore, it finds alternative dispute resolution in the sense of the right to adequate remedies (fundamental principle of the European Union). The study further explores the roots of alternative dispute resolution, its features and applicability, and the benefits of alternative dispute resolution over litigation/arbitration procedures, both of which tend to facilitate alternative dispute resolution’s broader use of business dispute resolution procedures. The qualitative research methodology will be applying for this research.
商事合同替代性争议解决原则,特别是调解条款
替代性争议解决程序在独立或所谓中立的专业人士的协助下,提供了一种友好的解决机制,以解决缔约双方之间的冲突。替代性争端解决在当今世界日益重要,涉及替代性争端解决条款的协议数量正在稳步增长。替代性纠纷解决通常比传统的法院诉讼更有效、更省时,这是其发展的原因之一。目前的研究探讨了欧盟调解最常见的替代性争议解决策略。它主要涉及法律和商业冲突的调解。本研究讨论了欧盟的替代性争议解决模式以及欧盟法规、联合国国际贸易法委员会《国际商事调解示范法》(2002年)下的相关要求,以及国际商会和有效争议解决中心等替代性争议解决相关组织制定的其他法律。它还将美利坚合众国与欧洲联盟一些成员国的法院在替代性争端解决事项方面的做法作了比较。此外,它在获得适当补救的权利(欧洲联盟的基本原则)的意义上找到了其他解决争端的办法。本研究进一步探讨了替代性争议解决的根源,其特点和适用性,以及替代性争议解决相对于诉讼/仲裁程序的好处,这两者都倾向于促进替代性争议解决更广泛地应用于商业争议解决程序。本研究将采用质性研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信