Repeat to Remake: Diablo Cody and Karyn Kusama’s Jennifer’s Body

K. Paszkiewicz
{"title":"Repeat to Remake: Diablo Cody and Karyn Kusama’s Jennifer’s Body","authors":"K. Paszkiewicz","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474425261.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If, as Jane Gaines (2012) suggests, instead of ‘transgressing’ the formal dictates of the industrial genre (that is, instead of ‘going against genre’), some women filmmakers ‘go with genre’, this might be particularly so in the case of horror cinema. The analysis of the much-maligned Jennifer’s Body (2009), written by Diablo Cody and directed by Karyn Kusama, demonstrates precisely this point. The chapter begins by discussing the marketing of Jennifer’s Body, in order to show how those in charge of film distribution and publicity used the director’s and writer’s gender as a promotional tool, and how the filmmakers themselves might have determined certain feminist and postfeminist readings of their film. These readings are contextualised within Diablo Cody’s broader self-promotional activities and her “commercial auteurism” (Corrigan 1991) and raise several questions about what is at stake when women practitioners make horror films and the implications should a filmmaker self-identify as a feminist filmmaker. The chapter then offers a close examination of Jennifer’s Body by rethinking the theories of Barbara Creed (1993) and Carol J. Clover (1992) and by inscribing the film within the wider context of teen movies and postfeminist media culture, making room for reflection on female spectatorial pleasures. It concludes that rather than undoing the horror genre, Jennifer’s Body explores its productive potential, participating in its continuous re-inscription of the relationship between women and violence.","PeriodicalId":105961,"journal":{"name":"Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474425261.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If, as Jane Gaines (2012) suggests, instead of ‘transgressing’ the formal dictates of the industrial genre (that is, instead of ‘going against genre’), some women filmmakers ‘go with genre’, this might be particularly so in the case of horror cinema. The analysis of the much-maligned Jennifer’s Body (2009), written by Diablo Cody and directed by Karyn Kusama, demonstrates precisely this point. The chapter begins by discussing the marketing of Jennifer’s Body, in order to show how those in charge of film distribution and publicity used the director’s and writer’s gender as a promotional tool, and how the filmmakers themselves might have determined certain feminist and postfeminist readings of their film. These readings are contextualised within Diablo Cody’s broader self-promotional activities and her “commercial auteurism” (Corrigan 1991) and raise several questions about what is at stake when women practitioners make horror films and the implications should a filmmaker self-identify as a feminist filmmaker. The chapter then offers a close examination of Jennifer’s Body by rethinking the theories of Barbara Creed (1993) and Carol J. Clover (1992) and by inscribing the film within the wider context of teen movies and postfeminist media culture, making room for reflection on female spectatorial pleasures. It concludes that rather than undoing the horror genre, Jennifer’s Body explores its productive potential, participating in its continuous re-inscription of the relationship between women and violence.
重复重拍:Diablo Cody和Karyn Kusama的Jennifer 's Body
正如简·盖恩斯(Jane Gaines, 2012)所建议的那样,如果一些女性电影人不是“违反”工业类型的正式规定(也就是说,不是“违背类型”),而是“顺应类型”,这可能在恐怖电影中尤其如此。对迪亚波罗·科迪(Diablo Cody)编剧、卡林·库萨马(Karyn Kusama)导演、饱受诟病的《詹妮弗的身体》(Jennifer 's Body, 2009)的分析,恰恰证明了这一点。本章首先讨论了《詹妮弗的身体》的市场营销,以展示那些负责电影发行和宣传的人是如何利用导演和作家的性别作为宣传工具的,以及电影制片人自己是如何决定他们的电影的某些女权主义和后女权主义解读的。这些阅读是在Diablo Cody更广泛的自我宣传活动和她的“商业导演主义”(Corrigan 1991)的背景下进行的,并提出了几个问题,即当女性从业者制作恐怖电影时,什么是危险的,以及电影制作人应该自我认同为女权主义电影制作人的含义。然后,本章通过重新思考芭芭拉·克里德(1993)和卡罗尔·j·克洛弗(1992)的理论,并将这部电影置于青少年电影和后女权主义媒体文化的更广泛背景下,对《詹妮弗的身体》进行了仔细的审视,为女性观影人乐的反思留出了空间。它的结论是,《詹妮弗的身体》并没有摧毁恐怖类型,而是探索了它的生产潜力,参与了女性与暴力之间关系的不断重新铭刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信