Performance Analysis of Neo4j, MongoDB, and PostgreSQL on 2019 National Election Big Data Management Database

Linggis Galih Wiseso, Mahmud Imrona, A. Alamsyah
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Neo4j, MongoDB, and PostgreSQL on 2019 National Election Big Data Management Database","authors":"Linggis Galih Wiseso, Mahmud Imrona, A. Alamsyah","doi":"10.1109/ICSITech49800.2020.9392041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data has now become a major commodity and asset for any organization. There’s also a phenomenon called Big Data where it’s a term to describes a large volume of data, both structured and unstructured. With big data, any organization can analyze the data and its results are used for decision making and business strategy. Political parties, for example, use it to analyze the likelihood of their candidate winning in the election based on voter data who votes for their candidate. In Indonesia itself, the use of big data has not been utilized because of limited database infrastructure. Therefore, Indonesia needs a good database that can utilize big data. In this study, the author examines the performance of PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Neo4J by analyzing each of its complexity using computational complexity theory with Big O notation as its tool. With Big O, the author measures the complexity of each execution time. The conclusion from this study is that MongoDB has excellent performance because it has an O(1) complexity, PostgreSQL has good performance because it has an O(n) and O(1) complexities, and Neo4j has worse performance than MongoDB and PostgreSQL because it has an O(nlog n) complexity.","PeriodicalId":408532,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech49800.2020.9392041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Data has now become a major commodity and asset for any organization. There’s also a phenomenon called Big Data where it’s a term to describes a large volume of data, both structured and unstructured. With big data, any organization can analyze the data and its results are used for decision making and business strategy. Political parties, for example, use it to analyze the likelihood of their candidate winning in the election based on voter data who votes for their candidate. In Indonesia itself, the use of big data has not been utilized because of limited database infrastructure. Therefore, Indonesia needs a good database that can utilize big data. In this study, the author examines the performance of PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Neo4J by analyzing each of its complexity using computational complexity theory with Big O notation as its tool. With Big O, the author measures the complexity of each execution time. The conclusion from this study is that MongoDB has excellent performance because it has an O(1) complexity, PostgreSQL has good performance because it has an O(n) and O(1) complexities, and Neo4j has worse performance than MongoDB and PostgreSQL because it has an O(nlog n) complexity.
Neo4j、MongoDB、PostgreSQL在2019年全国大选大数据管理数据库中的性能分析
数据现在已经成为任何组织的主要商品和资产。还有一种现象叫做大数据,它是一个描述大量数据的术语,包括结构化和非结构化数据。有了大数据,任何组织都可以分析数据,并将其结果用于决策和商业战略。例如,政党用它来分析他们的候选人在选举中获胜的可能性,这是基于投票给他们候选人的选民数据。在印度尼西亚,由于数据库基础设施有限,大数据的使用尚未得到利用。因此,印尼需要一个可以利用大数据的好的数据库。在这项研究中,作者通过使用计算复杂性理论和大O符号作为工具,分析了PostgreSQL、MongoDB和Neo4J的每种复杂性,从而检查了它们的性能。在Big O中,作者度量每个执行时间的复杂性。本研究的结论是MongoDB因为复杂度为O(1)而性能优异,PostgreSQL因为复杂度为O(n)和O(1)而性能良好,Neo4j因为复杂度为O(nlog n)而性能比MongoDB和PostgreSQL差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信