5a The concept of autologous transfusion (CAT)

MD Wolfgang Schleinzer (Medical Manager), MD, PhD Günter Singbartl (Consultant in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine)
{"title":"5a The concept of autologous transfusion (CAT)","authors":"MD Wolfgang Schleinzer (Medical Manager),&nbsp;MD, PhD Günter Singbartl (Consultant in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80032-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Because of the potential risks of transmission of viral diseases by homologous blood, the so-far unsolved relevance of immunomodulation-suppression by homologous blood and the seasonal shortage of homologous blood, autologous transfusion techniques have gained importance over the last decade. As each single autologous transfusion measure has limitations of its own, these techniques should most effectively be combined into what has been called the ‘concept of autologous transfusion’ (CAT). This concept consists of the technical measures of autologous transfusion, for example acute normovolaemic haemodilution with intra- and post-operatively salvaged blood being either mechanically processed or unprocessed and directly retransfused, the autologous pre-deposit being separated into autologous blood donation with or without haemoseparation and into autologous pre-operative plasmapheresis. Establishing and routinely applying CAT resulted in a decrease of homologous blood by approximately 90% in major bone and joint surgery; on differentiating between aseptic and infectious orthopaedic surgery, more than 90% of the former were supplied with autologous blood while the latter was supplied by approximately 20% of autologous blood. The incidence of adverse events occurring in an autologous pre-deposit programme in more than 28 000 patients with more than 130 000 autologous units was 2.08% with respect to the number of patients taking part in this programme or 0.44% with respect to the number of autologous units harvested. Among this total number of 588 adverse events there were three severe ones (two male patients with myocardial infarction and one female patient with an apoplexy) and two fatal adverse events (one patient dying of massive pulmonary embolism and one female patient dying of an acute severe asthmatic attack). While CAT has been proven to reduce effectively the need for homologous blood it has also been shown that the appropriate selection of the patients as well as close and experienced monitoring and management of adverse events are necessary to make CAT not only an effective but also a safe alternative to homologous blood transfusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80610,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 301-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80032-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of the potential risks of transmission of viral diseases by homologous blood, the so-far unsolved relevance of immunomodulation-suppression by homologous blood and the seasonal shortage of homologous blood, autologous transfusion techniques have gained importance over the last decade. As each single autologous transfusion measure has limitations of its own, these techniques should most effectively be combined into what has been called the ‘concept of autologous transfusion’ (CAT). This concept consists of the technical measures of autologous transfusion, for example acute normovolaemic haemodilution with intra- and post-operatively salvaged blood being either mechanically processed or unprocessed and directly retransfused, the autologous pre-deposit being separated into autologous blood donation with or without haemoseparation and into autologous pre-operative plasmapheresis. Establishing and routinely applying CAT resulted in a decrease of homologous blood by approximately 90% in major bone and joint surgery; on differentiating between aseptic and infectious orthopaedic surgery, more than 90% of the former were supplied with autologous blood while the latter was supplied by approximately 20% of autologous blood. The incidence of adverse events occurring in an autologous pre-deposit programme in more than 28 000 patients with more than 130 000 autologous units was 2.08% with respect to the number of patients taking part in this programme or 0.44% with respect to the number of autologous units harvested. Among this total number of 588 adverse events there were three severe ones (two male patients with myocardial infarction and one female patient with an apoplexy) and two fatal adverse events (one patient dying of massive pulmonary embolism and one female patient dying of an acute severe asthmatic attack). While CAT has been proven to reduce effectively the need for homologous blood it has also been shown that the appropriate selection of the patients as well as close and experienced monitoring and management of adverse events are necessary to make CAT not only an effective but also a safe alternative to homologous blood transfusion.

5a自体输血(CAT)的概念
由于同源血液传播病毒性疾病的潜在风险、同源血液免疫调节抑制的相关性以及同源血液的季节性短缺,自体输血技术在过去十年中变得越来越重要。由于每一种自体输血措施都有其自身的局限性,这些技术应该最有效地结合到所谓的“自体输血概念”(CAT)中。这一概念包括自体输血的技术措施,如急性等容血稀释,术后和术中回收的血液经机械处理或未经处理直接再输,将自体预积液分为有或无血液分离的自体献血和自体术前血浆置换。建立和常规应用CAT导致大骨和关节手术中同源血减少约90%;在区分无菌骨科手术和感染性骨科手术时,前者90%以上采用自体血供血,后者约20%采用自体血供血。在超过28000名患者中,有超过130000个自体单位,在自体储备前计划中发生不良事件的发生率相对于参加该计划的患者人数为2.08%,相对于收获的自体单位数量为0.44%。在这588例不良事件中,有3例严重不良事件(2例男性心肌梗死,1例女性中风)和2例致命不良事件(1例患者死于大面积肺栓塞,1例女性患者死于急性严重哮喘发作)。虽然CAT已被证明可以有效减少对异体血液的需求,但也表明,适当选择患者以及密切和有经验的不良事件监测和管理对于使CAT不仅是一种有效而且安全的异体输血替代方案是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信