Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines.

S. Chauhan, E. Magann, John R. Scott, J. Scardo, N. Hendrix, J. Martin
{"title":"Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines.","authors":"S. Chauhan, E. Magann, John R. Scott, J. Scardo, N. Hendrix, J. Martin","doi":"10.1097/00006254-200406000-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo review the English-language literature from 1990 to 2000 on cesarean delivery for \"fetal distress\" and assess compliance with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA PubMed search with the search items cesarean, fetal distress, cesarean, nonreassuring fetal heart rate, cesarean, neonatal acidosis and cesarean, umbilical arterial pH was undertaken. Excluded from the search were case reports, letters to the editor, focus on fetal anomaly, combinations with other reasons for operative delivery (either abdominally or vaginally) or absence of pertinent information.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong 392 articles from the search, 169 met the inclusion criteria. Three reports provided detailed information on use of scalp pH; use occurred in 5% (60/1,128) of emergency cesareans. Three reports provided data on the use of tocolytics for intrauterine resuscitation; the combined result was 16% (201/1,261). Five reports assessed the decision-to-incision interval within 30 minutes; in 59% (262/446) of cases it was achieved. Five reports contained cord pH information on 340 emergency cesarean deliveries; umbilical arterial pH was < 7.00 in 10%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPhysician use of, and compliance with, ACOG guidelines for emergency cesarean deliveries is difficult to assess, and incomplete compliance appears commonplace.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200406000-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review the English-language literature from 1990 to 2000 on cesarean delivery for "fetal distress" and assess compliance with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. STUDY DESIGN A PubMed search with the search items cesarean, fetal distress, cesarean, nonreassuring fetal heart rate, cesarean, neonatal acidosis and cesarean, umbilical arterial pH was undertaken. Excluded from the search were case reports, letters to the editor, focus on fetal anomaly, combinations with other reasons for operative delivery (either abdominally or vaginally) or absence of pertinent information. RESULTS Among 392 articles from the search, 169 met the inclusion criteria. Three reports provided detailed information on use of scalp pH; use occurred in 5% (60/1,128) of emergency cesareans. Three reports provided data on the use of tocolytics for intrauterine resuscitation; the combined result was 16% (201/1,261). Five reports assessed the decision-to-incision interval within 30 minutes; in 59% (262/446) of cases it was achieved. Five reports contained cord pH information on 340 emergency cesarean deliveries; umbilical arterial pH was < 7.00 in 10%. CONCLUSION Physician use of, and compliance with, ACOG guidelines for emergency cesarean deliveries is difficult to assess, and incomplete compliance appears commonplace.
胎儿心率追踪不可靠的紧急剖宫产。遵守ACOG的指导方针。
目的回顾1990年至2000年关于剖宫产治疗“胎儿窘迫”的英文文献,并评估其对美国妇产科学会(ACOG)指南的依从性。研究设计:在PubMed上进行检索,检索条目为剖宫产、胎儿窘迫、剖宫产、不放心胎心率、剖宫产、新生儿酸中毒和剖宫产、脐动脉pH。排除病例报告、给编辑的信件、胎儿异常、合并其他原因的手术分娩(腹部或阴道)或缺乏相关信息。结果在检索到的392篇文献中,169篇符合纳入标准。三份报告提供了头皮pH值使用的详细信息;5%(60/1,128)的紧急剖宫产患者使用该药物。三份报告提供了宫内复苏使用促胎药的数据;综合结果为16%(201/1,261)。5份报告评估了30分钟内的决定-切口时间;59%(262/446)的病例实现了这一目标。5份报告载有340例紧急剖宫产的脐带pH值信息;10%脐带动脉pH < 7.00。结论急诊剖宫产ACOG指南的使用和依从性难以评估,不完全依从性很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信